From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH BACKPORT 4.7 0/4] MIPS: KVM: Fix MMU/TLB management issues Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 12:25:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20160818102521.GA21052@kroah.com> References: <20160818094217.GA1509@kroah.com> <20160818100036.GE19514@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Ralf Baechle , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: James Hogan Return-path: Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:36543 "EHLO out2-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752648AbcHRKZM (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2016 06:25:12 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160818100036.GE19514@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:00:36AM +0100, James Hogan wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:42:17AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:01:25AM +0100, James Hogan wrote: > > > These patches backport fixes for several issues in the management of > > > MIPS KVM TLB faults to v4.7. > > > > Thanks for these, now applied. > > Thanks Greg, > > btw, is it okay to tag for stable in this way, knowing full well that > they'll all conflict and require backports? > > Depending on your FAILED emails before sending backports just seemed > easier from my point of view, but if that increases any manual effort on > the part of the stable maintainers I can do it differently in future. That's fine with me, but if you know they are going to need to be backported, you can send those before you get the FAILED message so that I know to use those instead. thanks, greg k-h