From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3] powerpc: Check whether TM is available
 before running other tests
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:49:44 +0200
Message-ID: <20161012144944.GD30525@potion>
References: <1475572050-13164-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com>
 <1475652308.2070.2.camel@gmail.com>
 <44839565-1783-02f7-8157-53894d527141@redhat.com>
 <0eeb8d4a-a01f-6d9e-ec12-7b8eef6204b5@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58846 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S932765AbcJLOtu (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:49:50 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0eeb8d4a-a01f-6d9e-ec12-7b8eef6204b5@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

2016-10-12 10:19+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 12/10/2016 10:04, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 05.10.2016 09:25, Suraj Jitindar Singh wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 11:07 +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>> Transactional memory is currently only supported on KVM-HV, and
>>>> not yet on KVM-PR. So it's better to check the device tree first
>>>> and fail gracefully if it is not available.
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>> Thanks for sending a v3.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  v3:
>>>>  - Removed unnecessary check for "plen >= 26" in cpu_has_tm()
>>>>
>>>>  v2:
>>>>  - Reworked the check for the "ibm,pa-features" and added a comment
>>>>  - Use a dedicated variable "has_tm" instead of "i" in main()
>>>>
>>>>  powerpc/tm.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>>  Radim, Paolo,
>> 
>> I think this patch is now ready to go ... could you please pick it up?
>> (or shall I send a pull request for it?)
> 
> Pull requests are always welcome, at least by me. :)

Seconded.  I think cooperation will be smoother when using pull
requests ...  I didn't notice that the ball was on me this time.
Throwing it back for a pull request.