kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Jike Song <jike.song@intel.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com,
	kwankhede@nvidia.com, cjia@nvidia.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v3 4/5] vfio: implement APIs to set/put kvm to/from vfio group
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:04:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161107110412.5db26fd4@t450s.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1477895706-22824-5-git-send-email-jike.song@intel.com>

On Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:35:05 +0800
Jike Song <jike.song@intel.com> wrote:

Patch title is "set/put" but there is no "put".

> A vfio_group may be or may not be attached to a KVM instance,
> if it is, the user of vfio_group might also want to know which
> KVM instance it is attached to, to utilize features provided
> by KVM. In VFIO there are already external APIs for KVM to
> get/put the vfio_group, by extending that, KVM can set or clear
> itself to/from the vfio_group, for external users to use.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jike Song <jike.song@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.c  | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/vfio.h |  4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> index e3e58e3..41611cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>  #include <linux/vfio.h>
>  #include <linux/wait.h>
> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>  
>  #define DRIVER_VERSION	"0.3"
>  #define DRIVER_AUTHOR	"Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>"
> @@ -86,6 +87,10 @@ struct vfio_group {
>  	struct mutex			unbound_lock;
>  	atomic_t			opened;
>  	bool				noiommu;
> +	struct {
> +		struct kvm *kvm;
> +		struct mutex lock;
> +	} udata;
>  };
>  
>  struct vfio_device {
> @@ -333,6 +338,7 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_create_group(struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
>  	mutex_init(&group->device_lock);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&group->unbound_list);
>  	mutex_init(&group->unbound_lock);
> +	mutex_init(&group->udata.lock);
>  	atomic_set(&group->container_users, 0);
>  	atomic_set(&group->opened, 0);
>  	group->iommu_group = iommu_group;
> @@ -1739,6 +1745,30 @@ long vfio_external_check_extension(struct vfio_group *group, unsigned long arg)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_external_check_extension);
>  
> +void vfio_group_set_kvm(struct vfio_group *group, struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	mutex_lock(&group->udata.lock);
> +	group->udata.kvm = kvm;
> +	mutex_unlock(&group->udata.lock);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_group_set_kvm);
> +
> +struct kvm *vfio_group_get_kvm(struct vfio_group *group)
> +{
> +	struct kvm *kvm = NULL;

Unnecessary initialization.

> +
> +	mutex_lock(&group->udata.lock);
> +
> +	kvm = group->udata.kvm;
> +	if (kvm)
> +		kvm_get_kvm(kvm);
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&group->udata.lock);
> +
> +	return kvm;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_group_get_kvm);
> +

How are kvm references acquired through vfio_group_get_kvm() ever
released?  Can the reference become invalid?  The caller may still hold
a kvm references, but couldn't the group be detached from one kvm
instance and re-attached to another?  This seems like an ad-hoc
reference that doesn't impose any usage semantics on the caller or
release mechanism.  Thanks,

Alex


>  /**
>   * Sub-module support
>   */
> diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
> index ad9b857..3abd690 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -95,6 +95,10 @@ extern long vfio_external_check_extension(struct vfio_group *group,
>  extern struct vfio_group *vfio_group_get_from_dev(struct device *dev);
>  extern void vfio_group_put(struct vfio_group *group);
>  
> +struct kvm;
> +extern void vfio_group_set_kvm(struct vfio_group *group, struct kvm *kvm);
> +extern struct kvm *vfio_group_get_kvm(struct vfio_group *group);
> +
>  /*
>   * Sub-module helpers
>   */


  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-07 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-31  6:35 [v3 0/5] plumb kvm/vfio to allow getting kvm from vfio_group Jike Song
2016-10-31  6:35 ` [v3 1/5] vfio: Rearrange functions to get vfio_group from dev Jike Song
2016-10-31  6:35 ` [v3 2/5] vfio: export functions to get vfio_group from device and put it Jike Song
2016-10-31  6:35 ` [v3 3/5] KVM: move kvm_get_kvm to kvm_host.h Jike Song
2016-10-31  8:33   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-31  6:35 ` [v3 4/5] vfio: implement APIs to set/put kvm to/from vfio group Jike Song
2016-11-07 18:04   ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2016-11-07 18:10     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-07 18:28       ` Alex Williamson
2016-11-07 20:45         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-09 12:49           ` Jike Song
2016-11-09 13:06             ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-11-09 13:31               ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-09 14:00                 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-11-09 14:28                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-10  4:13                   ` Jike Song
2016-11-09 17:53             ` Alex Williamson
2016-11-10  4:10               ` Jike Song
2016-11-10  6:04                 ` Jike Song
2016-11-10 15:37                   ` Alex Williamson
2016-11-11  7:29                     ` Jike Song
2016-11-14 10:19               ` Jike Song
2016-11-14 15:52                 ` Alex Williamson
2016-11-09  2:28         ` Jike Song
2016-11-09  2:52           ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-11-09  3:07             ` Jike Song
2016-10-31  6:35 ` [v3 5/5] KVM: set/clear kvm to/from vfio group during add/delete Jike Song
2016-10-31  8:33   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-31  7:06 ` [v3 0/5] plumb kvm/vfio to allow getting kvm from vfio_group Xiao Guangrong
2016-10-31  7:24   ` Jike Song
2016-10-31  7:24     ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-10-31  7:30       ` Jike Song
2016-10-31  7:35         ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-11-02  1:06 ` Jike Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161107110412.5db26fd4@t450s.home \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
    --cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jike.song@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).