Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Cc: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Jeff Dike" <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
	"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	"Len Brown" <len.brown@intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	"Dmitry Safonov" <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com>,
	"David Matlack" <dmatlack@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 5/7] x86/cpufeature: Detect CPUID faulting support
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 12:14:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161109111453.hbkm5l6dex5ijh2o@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161108183956.4521-6-khuey@kylehuey.com>

On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 10:39:54AM -0800, Kyle Huey wrote:
> Intel supports faulting on the CPUID instruction beginning with Ivy Bridge.
> When enabled, the processor will fault on attempts to execute the CPUID
> instruction with CPL>0. This will allow a ptracer to emulate the CPUID
> instruction.
> 
> Bit 31 of MSR_PLATFORM_INFO advertises support for this feature. It is
> documented in detail in Section 2.3.2 of
> http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/application-notes/virtualization-technology-flexmigration-application-note.pdf
> 
> Detect support for this feature and expose it as X86_FEATURE_CPUID_FAULT.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <khuey@kylehuey.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h |  1 +
>  arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h   |  2 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c    | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> index a396292..62962e8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> @@ -184,16 +184,17 @@
>   * Auxiliary flags: Linux defined - For features scattered in various
>   * CPUID levels like 0x6, 0xA etc, word 7.
>   *
>   * Reuse free bits when adding new feature flags!
>   */
>  
>  #define X86_FEATURE_CPB		( 7*32+ 2) /* AMD Core Performance Boost */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_EPB		( 7*32+ 3) /* IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS support */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_CPUID_FAULT ( 7*32+ 4) /* Intel CPUID faulting */

Bit 0 in that leaf is free. Also, bit 4 is already claimed by RDT/CAT/...
whatever that thing is going to be called so please do:

#define X86_FEATURE_CPUID_FAULT ( 7*32+ 0) /* Intel CPUID faulting */

>  
>  #define X86_FEATURE_HW_PSTATE	( 7*32+ 8) /* AMD HW-PState */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_PROC_FEEDBACK ( 7*32+ 9) /* AMD ProcFeedbackInterface */
>  
>  #define X86_FEATURE_INTEL_PT	( 7*32+15) /* Intel Processor Trace */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512_4VNNIW (7*32+16) /* AVX-512 Neural Network Instructions */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512_4FMAPS (7*32+17) /* AVX-512 Multiply Accumulation Single precision */

...

>  	for (cb = cpuid_bits; cb->feature; cb++) {
>  
>  		/* Verify that the level is valid */
>  		max_level = cpuid_eax(cb->level & 0xffff0000);
>  		if (max_level < cb->level ||
>  		    max_level > (cb->level | 0xffff))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		cpuid_count(cb->level, cb->sub_leaf, &regs[CR_EAX],
>  			    &regs[CR_EBX], &regs[CR_ECX], &regs[CR_EDX]);
>  
>  		if (regs[cb->reg] & (1 << cb->bit))
>  			set_cpu_cap(c, cb->feature);
>  	}
> +
> +	for (mb = msr_bits; mb->feature; mb++) {
> +		if (rdmsrl_safe(mb->msr, &msrval))
> +			continue;

<--- newline here.

> +		if (msrval & (1ULL << mb->bit))

		if (msrval & BIT_ULL(mb->bit))


> +			set_cpu_cap(c, mb->feature);
> +	}
>  }
> -- 

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
-- 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-11-09 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-08 18:39 [PATCH v10 0/7] x86/arch_prctl Add ARCH_[GET|SET]_CPUID for controlling the CPUID instruction Kyle Huey
2016-11-08 18:39 ` [PATCH v10 1/7] x86/arch_prctl/64: Use SYSCALL_DEFINE2 to define sys_arch_prctl Kyle Huey
2016-11-09  9:47   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-10 18:17     ` Kyle Huey
2016-11-08 18:39 ` [PATCH v10 2/7] x86/arch_prctl/64: Rename do_arch_prctl to do_arch_prctl_64 Kyle Huey
2016-11-09  9:58   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-08 18:39 ` [PATCH v10 3/7] x86/arch_prctl: Add do_arch_prctl_common Kyle Huey
2016-11-09 10:31   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-08 18:39 ` [PATCH v10 4/7] x86/syscalls/32: Wire up arch_prctl on x86-32 Kyle Huey
2016-11-09 11:04   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-08 18:39 ` [PATCH v10 5/7] x86/cpufeature: Detect CPUID faulting support Kyle Huey
2016-11-08 19:06   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-11-08 19:38     ` Kyle Huey
2016-11-09 11:14   ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2016-11-08 18:39 ` [PATCH v10 6/7] x86/arch_prctl: Add ARCH_[GET|SET]_CPUID Kyle Huey
2016-11-08 20:06   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-11-09 13:21     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-09 13:34       ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-11-10 23:38         ` Kyle Huey
2016-11-10 23:26       ` Kyle Huey
2016-11-09 13:12   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-14 19:01   ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-03-14 19:08     ` Kyle Huey
2017-03-14 20:06       ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-03-14 19:17     ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-03-14 19:23     ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-15  9:11       ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-11-08 18:39 ` [PATCH v10 7/7] KVM: x86: virtualize cpuid faulting Kyle Huey
2016-11-08 22:12   ` David Matlack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161109111453.hbkm5l6dex5ijh2o@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=dsafonov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=me@kylehuey.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=robert@ocallahan.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox