From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Wei Huang <wei@redhat.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, shannon.zhao@linaro.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, christoffer.dall@linaro.org,
drjones@redhat.com, cov@codeaurora.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: perf: Move ARMv8 PMU perf event definitions to asm/perf_event.h
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 15:29:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161110152946.GG4418@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d9ef10b9-44f2-b02e-9d90-02cf348aa49c@redhat.com>
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 09:12:35AM -0600, Wei Huang wrote:
> On 11/10/2016 03:10 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On 09/11/16 19:57, Wei Huang wrote:
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h
> >> +/*
> >> + * ARMv8 PMUv3 Performance Events handling code.
> >> + * Common event types.
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +/* Required events. */
> >> +#define ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_SW_INCR 0x00
> >> +#define ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_L1D_CACHE_REFILL 0x03
> >> +#define ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_L1D_CACHE 0x04
> >> +#define ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_BR_MIS_PRED 0x10
> >> +#define ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_CPU_CYCLES 0x11
> >> +#define ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_BR_PRED 0x12
> >
> > In my initial review, I asked for the "required" events to be moved to a
> > shared location. What's the rational for moving absolutely everything?
>
> I did notice the phrase "required" in the original email. However I
> think it is weird to have two places for a same set of PMU definitions.
> Other developers might think these two are missing if they don't search
> kernel files carefully.
>
> If Will Deacon and you insist, I can move only two defs to perf_event.h,
> consolidated with the 2nd patch into a single one.
FWIW, my personal preference would be for all the definitions (or at
least all of the ARMV8_PMUV3_* ones) to be in one place.
That said, I don't feel particularly strongly either way, and I'll defer
to Will.
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-10 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-09 19:57 [PATCH 1/2] arm64: perf: Move ARMv8 PMU perf event definitions to asm/perf_event.h Wei Huang
2016-11-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: ARM64: Fix the issues when guest PMCCFILTR is configured Wei Huang
2016-11-10 1:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: perf: Move ARMv8 PMU perf event definitions to asm/perf_event.h kbuild test robot
2016-11-10 9:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-11-10 15:12 ` Wei Huang
2016-11-10 15:29 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-11-10 15:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-11-10 17:17 ` Will Deacon
2016-11-10 18:09 ` Wei Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161110152946.GG4418@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=shannon.zhao@linaro.org \
--cc=wei@redhat.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).