kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Jike Song <jike.song@intel.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com,
	kwankhede@nvidia.com, cjia@nvidia.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v6 2/3] vfio: support notifier chain in vfio_group
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:55:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161118105557.70851cd5@t450s.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479466909-31765-3-git-send-email-jike.song@intel.com>

On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 19:01:48 +0800
Jike Song <jike.song@intel.com> wrote:

> Beyond vfio_iommu events, users might also be interested in
> vfio_group events. For example, if a vfio_group is used along
> with Qemu/KVM, whenever kvm pointer is set to/cleared from the
> vfio_group, users could be notified.
> 
> Currently only VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM supported.
> 
> Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Cc: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jike Song <jike.song@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.c  | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/vfio.h |  6 +++++
>  2 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> index ec62bec..e2bb197 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> @@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ struct vfio_group {
>  	struct mutex			unbound_lock;
>  	atomic_t			opened;
>  	bool				noiommu;
> +	struct kvm			*kvm;
> +	struct blocking_notifier_head	notifier;
>  };
>  
>  struct vfio_device {
> @@ -339,6 +341,7 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_create_group(struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU
>  	group->noiommu = (iommu_group_get_iommudata(iommu_group) == &noiommu);
>  #endif
> +	BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&group->notifier);
>  
>  	group->nb.notifier_call = vfio_iommu_group_notifier;
>  
> @@ -1015,6 +1018,63 @@ static long vfio_ioctl_check_extension(struct vfio_container *container,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +void vfio_group_set_kvm(struct vfio_group *group, struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	group->kvm = kvm;
> +	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&group->notifier,
> +				VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM, kvm);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_group_set_kvm);
> +
> +static int vfio_register_group_notifier(struct vfio_group *group,
> +					unsigned long *events,
> +					struct notifier_block *nb)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	bool set_kvm = false;
> +
> +	if (*events & VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM)
> +		set_kvm = true;
> +
> +	/* clear known events */
> +	*events &= ~VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM;
> +
> +	/* refuse to continue if still events remaining */
> +	if (*events)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&group->opened))
> +		return -EINVAL;

vfio_group.opened is only used to make sure we don't allow multiple
opens of the group, incrementing it doesn't currently assure the group
remains opened.  What happens if the user process releases the group in
the midst of this?

> +
> +	ret = blocking_notifier_chain_register(&group->notifier, nb);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The attaching of kvm and vfio_group might already happen, so
> +	 * here we replay once upon registration.
> +	 */
> +	if (!ret && set_kvm && group->kvm)
> +		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&group->notifier,
> +					VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM, group->kvm);
> +
> +	atomic_dec(&group->opened);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_unregister_group_notifier(struct vfio_group *group,
> +					 struct notifier_block *nb)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&group->opened))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	ret = blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&group->notifier, nb);
> +
> +	atomic_dec(&group->opened);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  /* hold write lock on container->group_lock */
>  static int __vfio_container_attach_groups(struct vfio_container *container,
>  					  struct vfio_iommu_driver *driver,
> @@ -1581,6 +1641,9 @@ static int vfio_group_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
>  
>  	filep->private_data = NULL;
>  
> +	/* Any user didn't unregister? */
> +	WARN_ON(group->notifier.head);

Have you tested whether the ordering is correct that the vendor driver
sees the device release first and can therefore unregister notifiers
before the group is released when the user process is killed?

> +
>  	vfio_group_try_dissolve_container(group);
>  
>  	atomic_dec(&group->opened);
> @@ -2088,6 +2151,9 @@ int vfio_register_notifier(struct device *dev, vfio_notify_type_t type,
>  	case VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY:
>  		ret = vfio_register_iommu_notifier(group, events, nb);
>  		break;
> +	case VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY:
> +		ret = vfio_register_group_notifier(group, events, nb);
> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		ret = EINVAL;
>  	}
> @@ -2114,6 +2180,9 @@ int vfio_unregister_notifier(struct device *dev, vfio_notify_type_t type,
>  	case VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY:
>  		ret = vfio_unregister_iommu_notifier(group, nb);
>  		break;
> +	case VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY:
> +		ret = vfio_unregister_group_notifier(group, nb);
> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
>  	}
> diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
> index 6f3ff31..5d46e3c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -119,11 +119,17 @@ extern int vfio_unregister_notifier(struct device *dev,
>  /* each type has independent events */
>  enum vfio_notify_type {
>  	VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY = (__force vfio_notify_type_t)0,
> +	VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY = (__force vfio_notify_type_t)1,
>  };
>  
>  /* events for VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY */
>  #define VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY_DMA_UNMAP	BIT(0)
>  
> +/* events for VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY */
> +#define VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM	BIT(0)
> +
> +struct kvm;
> +extern void vfio_group_set_kvm(struct vfio_group *group, struct kvm *kvm);
>  
>  /*
>   * Sub-module helpers


  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-18 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-18 11:01 [v6 0/3] plumb kvm/vfio to notify kvm:group attach/detach Jike Song
2016-11-18 11:01 ` [v6 1/3] vfio: vfio_register_notifier: classify iommu notifier Jike Song
2016-11-18 17:55   ` Alex Williamson
2016-11-19  3:32     ` Jike Song
2016-11-18 11:01 ` [v6 2/3] vfio: support notifier chain in vfio_group Jike Song
2016-11-18 17:55   ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2016-11-19  4:14     ` Jike Song
2016-11-21 16:56       ` Alex Williamson
2016-11-22  6:21         ` Jike Song
2016-11-18 11:01 ` [v6 3/3] kvm: set/clear kvm to/from vfio_group when group add/delete Jike Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161118105557.70851cd5@t450s.home \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
    --cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jike.song@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).