From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] KVM: x86: decouple irqchip_in_kernel() and pic_irqchip()
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 17:31:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161124163134.4630-3-rkrcmar@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161124163134.4630-1-rkrcmar@redhat.com>
irqchip_in_kernel() tried to save a bit by reusing pic_irqchip(), but it
just complicated the code.
Add kvm->arch.irqchip_kvm that matches kvm->arch.irqchip_split.
(Turning them into an exclusive type would be nicer.)
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/irq.h | 13 +++++++------
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index bdde80731f49..929228ec2839 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -778,6 +778,7 @@ struct kvm_arch {
u64 disabled_quirks;
+ bool irqchip_kvm;
bool irqchip_split;
u8 nr_reserved_ioapic_pins;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/irq.h b/arch/x86/kvm/irq.h
index 035731eb3897..8536be85d529 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/irq.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/irq.h
@@ -96,15 +96,16 @@ static inline int irqchip_split(struct kvm *kvm)
return kvm->arch.irqchip_split;
}
+static inline int irqchip_kvm(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ return kvm->arch.irqchip_kvm;
+}
+
static inline int irqchip_in_kernel(struct kvm *kvm)
{
- struct kvm_pic *vpic = pic_irqchip(kvm);
- bool ret;
+ bool ret = irqchip_kvm(kvm) || irqchip_split(kvm);
- ret = (vpic != NULL);
- ret |= irqchip_split(kvm);
-
- /* Read vpic before kvm->irq_routing. */
+ /* Matches with wmb after initializing kvm->irq_routing. */
smp_rmb();
return ret;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index dbed51045c37..dd8431a7e18b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -3928,8 +3928,9 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
goto create_irqchip_unlock;
}
- /* Write kvm->irq_routing before kvm->arch.vpic. */
+ /* Write kvm->irq_routing before enabling irqchip_in_kernel. */
smp_wmb();
+ kvm->arch.irqchip_kvm = true;
kvm->arch.vpic = vpic;
create_irqchip_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
--
2.10.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-24 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-24 16:31 [PATCH 0/6] KVM: x86: minor irqchip improvements (API change) Radim Krčmář
2016-11-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86: do allow kvm irqchip with split irqchip Radim Krčmář
2016-11-24 16:31 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2016-11-24 16:55 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: x86: decouple irqchip_in_kernel() and pic_irqchip() Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-24 17:21 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-11-25 8:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-25 17:11 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-11-25 17:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86: make pic setup code look like ioapic setup Radim Krčmář
2016-11-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: x86: refactor pic setup in kvm_set_routing_entry Radim Krčmář
2016-11-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: x86: prevent setup of invalid routes Radim Krčmář
2016-11-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: x86: simplify conditions with split/kvm irqchip Radim Krčmář
2016-11-24 16:58 ` [PATCH 0/6] KVM: x86: minor irqchip improvements (API change) Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161124163134.4630-3-rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox