From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull my kvm-ppc-next branch Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:25:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20161130172528.GD1682@potion> References: <20161128225307.GA3126@fergus.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Mackerras Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33474 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758565AbcK3RZc (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:25:32 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161128225307.GA3126@fergus.ozlabs.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2016-11-29 09:53+1100, Paul Mackerras: > Paolo, > > Please do a pull from my kvm-ppc-next branch to get a PPC KVM update > for 4.10. This includes some changes to arch/powerpc which Michael > Ellerman put into a topic branch in his powerpc tree (topic/ppc-kvm) > which I have pulled into my kvm-ppc-next branch and which Michael will > pull into his next branch. > > The changes this time are: > > * Support for KVM guests on POWER9 using the hashed page table MMU. > * Updates and improvements to the halt-polling support on PPC, from > Suraj Jitindar Singh. > * An optimization to speed up emulated MMIO, from Yongji Xie. > * Various other minor cleanups. > > Suraj's patch set includes some changes to core KVM code which were > posted back in October and didn't attract much comment, so I put them > in. They add some documentation for halt polling and export the > module parameters used to control halt polling. Yes, they look fine, just forgotten. > Full disclosure: after I had pushed out some of the patches for POWER9 > support, I discovered that they broke compilation with some uncommon > configurations (those with HV KVM enabled but in-kernel XICS interrupt > controller emulation disabled, or with SMP disabled). Since my > kvm-ppc-next branch is a non-rebasing branch, I pushed a patch on top > to fix the breakage. So bisection is broken over a span of about 6 > commits for these unusual configurations. If you want me to rebase my > kvm-ppc-next branch to avoid the breakage, let me know and I will do > that. I trust your judgement on severity of the problem. Pulled, thanks.