Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Cc: marc.zyngier@arm.com, andre.przywara@arm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH kvm-unit-tests v8 10/10] arm/arm64: gic: don't just use zero
Date: Thu,  8 Dec 2016 18:50:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161208175030.12269-11-drjones@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161208175030.12269-1-drjones@redhat.com>

Instead of using cpu0 and irq=0 for the IPI test, use something
a bit more interesting. To make sure we can still run the test
with the minimal number of cpus (2), we need to use sender=1. As
the irq in the test (an SGI) can only be 0 to 15 and there's really
no difference, then use irq=1. sender=1 is a bit limited for the
long term, as we may want to test IPIs across host sockets with
pinned vcpus. But we can improve on this later, possibly with the
introduction of a command line parameter.

Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>

---
v8:
 - remove crufy command line parsing. No need for sender or irq
   to be input right now.
v7:
 - cleanup cmdline parsing and add complain on bad args [Eric]
v6:
 - make sender/irq names more future-proof [drew]
 - sanity check inputs [drew]
 - introduce check_sender/irq and bad_sender/irq to more
   cleanly do checks [drew]
 - default sender and irq to 1, instead of still zero [drew]
v4: improve structure and make sure spurious checking is
    done even when the sender isn't cpu0
v2: actually check that the irq received was the irq sent,
    and (for gicv2) that the sender is the expected one.
---
 arm/gic.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arm/gic.c b/arm/gic.c
index d0d3be0fa36e..3054d45f7387 100644
--- a/arm/gic.c
+++ b/arm/gic.c
@@ -19,6 +19,9 @@
 #include <asm/barrier.h>
 #include <asm/io.h>
 
+#define IPI_SENDER	1
+#define IPI_IRQ		1
+
 struct gic {
 	struct {
 		void (*send_self)(void);
@@ -28,6 +31,7 @@ struct gic {
 
 static struct gic *gic;
 static int acked[NR_CPUS], spurious[NR_CPUS];
+static int bad_sender[NR_CPUS], bad_irq[NR_CPUS];
 static cpumask_t ready;
 
 static void nr_cpu_check(int nr)
@@ -43,10 +47,23 @@ static void wait_on_ready(void)
 		cpu_relax();
 }
 
+static void stats_reset(void)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; ++i) {
+		acked[i] = 0;
+		bad_sender[i] = -1;
+		bad_irq[i] = -1;
+	}
+	smp_wmb();
+}
+
 static void check_acked(cpumask_t *mask)
 {
 	int missing = 0, extra = 0, unexpected = 0;
 	int nr_pass, cpu, i;
+	bool bad = false;
 
 	/* Wait up to 5s for all interrupts to be delivered */
 	for (i = 0; i < 50; ++i) {
@@ -56,9 +73,21 @@ static void check_acked(cpumask_t *mask)
 			smp_rmb();
 			nr_pass += cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mask) ?
 				acked[cpu] == 1 : acked[cpu] == 0;
+
+			if (bad_sender[cpu] != -1) {
+				printf("cpu%d received IPI from wrong sender %d\n",
+					cpu, bad_sender[cpu]);
+				bad = true;
+			}
+
+			if (bad_irq[cpu] != -1) {
+				printf("cpu%d received wrong irq %d\n",
+					cpu, bad_irq[cpu]);
+				bad = true;
+			}
 		}
 		if (nr_pass == nr_cpus) {
-			report("Completed in %d ms", true, ++i * 100);
+			report("Completed in %d ms", !bad, ++i * 100);
 			return;
 		}
 	}
@@ -91,6 +120,22 @@ static void check_spurious(void)
 	}
 }
 
+static void check_ipi_sender(u32 irqstat)
+{
+	if (gic_version() == 2) {
+		int src = (irqstat >> 10) & 7;
+
+		if (src != IPI_SENDER)
+			bad_sender[smp_processor_id()] = src;
+	}
+}
+
+static void check_irqnr(u32 irqnr)
+{
+	if (irqnr != IPI_IRQ)
+		bad_irq[smp_processor_id()] = irqnr;
+}
+
 static void ipi_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused)
 {
 	u32 irqstat = gic_read_iar();
@@ -98,8 +143,10 @@ static void ipi_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused)
 
 	if (irqnr != GICC_INT_SPURIOUS) {
 		gic_write_eoir(irqstat);
-		smp_rmb(); /* pairs with wmb in ipi_test functions */
+		smp_rmb(); /* pairs with wmb in stats_reset */
 		++acked[smp_processor_id()];
+		check_ipi_sender(irqstat);
+		check_irqnr(irqnr);
 		smp_wmb(); /* pairs with rmb in check_acked */
 	} else {
 		++spurious[smp_processor_id()];
@@ -109,22 +156,22 @@ static void ipi_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused)
 
 static void gicv2_ipi_send_self(void)
 {
-	writel(2 << 24, gicv2_dist_base() + GICD_SGIR);
+	writel(2 << 24 | IPI_IRQ, gicv2_dist_base() + GICD_SGIR);
 }
 
 static void gicv2_ipi_send_broadcast(void)
 {
-	writel(1 << 24, gicv2_dist_base() + GICD_SGIR);
+	writel(1 << 24 | IPI_IRQ, gicv2_dist_base() + GICD_SGIR);
 }
 
 static void gicv3_ipi_send_self(void)
 {
-	gic_ipi_send_single(0, smp_processor_id());
+	gic_ipi_send_single(IPI_IRQ, smp_processor_id());
 }
 
 static void gicv3_ipi_send_broadcast(void)
 {
-	gicv3_write_sgi1r(1ULL << 40);
+	gicv3_write_sgi1r(1ULL << 40 | IPI_IRQ << 24);
 	isb();
 }
 
@@ -133,10 +180,9 @@ static void ipi_test_self(void)
 	cpumask_t mask;
 
 	report_prefix_push("self");
-	memset(acked, 0, sizeof(acked));
-	smp_wmb();
+	stats_reset();
 	cpumask_clear(&mask);
-	cpumask_set_cpu(0, &mask);
+	cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &mask);
 	gic->ipi.send_self();
 	check_acked(&mask);
 	report_prefix_pop();
@@ -148,20 +194,18 @@ static void ipi_test_smp(void)
 	int i;
 
 	report_prefix_push("target-list");
-	memset(acked, 0, sizeof(acked));
-	smp_wmb();
+	stats_reset();
 	cpumask_copy(&mask, &cpu_present_mask);
-	for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i += 2)
+	for (i = smp_processor_id() & 1; i < nr_cpus; i += 2)
 		cpumask_clear_cpu(i, &mask);
-	gic_ipi_send_mask(0, &mask);
+	gic_ipi_send_mask(IPI_IRQ, &mask);
 	check_acked(&mask);
 	report_prefix_pop();
 
 	report_prefix_push("broadcast");
-	memset(acked, 0, sizeof(acked));
-	smp_wmb();
+	stats_reset();
 	cpumask_copy(&mask, &cpu_present_mask);
-	cpumask_clear_cpu(0, &mask);
+	cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &mask);
 	gic->ipi.send_broadcast();
 	check_acked(&mask);
 	report_prefix_pop();
@@ -178,6 +222,16 @@ static void ipi_enable(void)
 	local_irq_enable();
 }
 
+static void ipi_send(void)
+{
+	ipi_enable();
+	wait_on_ready();
+	ipi_test_self();
+	ipi_test_smp();
+	check_spurious();
+	exit(report_summary());
+}
+
 static void ipi_recv(void)
 {
 	ipi_enable();
@@ -232,14 +286,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
 			if (cpu == 0)
 				continue;
-			smp_boot_secondary(cpu, ipi_recv);
+			smp_boot_secondary(cpu,
+				cpu == IPI_SENDER ? ipi_send : ipi_recv);
 		}
-		ipi_enable();
-		wait_on_ready();
-		ipi_test_self();
-		ipi_test_smp();
-		check_spurious();
-		report_prefix_pop();
+		ipi_recv();
 	} else {
 		report_abort("Unknown subtest '%s'", argv[1]);
 	}
-- 
2.9.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-12-08 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-08 17:50 [PATCH kvm-unit-tests v8 00/10] arm/arm64: add gic framework Andrew Jones
2016-12-08 17:50 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests v8 01/10] arm/arm64: yield on cpu_relax Andrew Jones
2016-12-08 17:50 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests v8 02/10] arm/arm64: smp: support more than 8 cpus Andrew Jones
2016-12-08 17:50 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests v8 03/10] arm/arm64: add some delay routines Andrew Jones
2016-12-09 11:41   ` Andre Przywara
2016-12-09 12:15     ` [Qemu-devel] " Andrew Jones
2016-12-27 15:27       ` Christopher Covington
2016-12-27 16:27         ` Andrew Jones
2016-12-13 16:41   ` Alex Bennée
2016-12-13 17:09     ` Alex Bennée
2016-12-08 17:50 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests v8 04/10] arm/arm64: irq enable/disable Andrew Jones
2016-12-08 17:50 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests v8 05/10] arm/arm64: add initial gicv2 support Andrew Jones
2016-12-08 17:50 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests v8 06/10] arm/arm64: gicv2: add an IPI test Andrew Jones
2016-12-08 17:50 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests v8 07/10] libcflat: add IS_ALIGNED() macro, and page sizes Andrew Jones
2016-12-08 17:50 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests v8 08/10] arm/arm64: add initial gicv3 support Andrew Jones
2016-12-08 17:50 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests v8 09/10] arm/arm64: gicv3: add an IPI test Andrew Jones
2016-12-09 16:08   ` Andre Przywara
2016-12-09 17:28     ` Andrew Jones
2016-12-08 17:50 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2016-12-14 13:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH kvm-unit-tests v8 00/10] arm/arm64: add gic framework Andrew Jones
2016-12-14 15:36   ` Alex Bennée

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161208175030.12269-11-drjones@redhat.com \
    --to=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox