From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/5] PTP: add PTP_SYS_OFFSET emulation via cross timestamps infrastructure
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:23:29 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170124112326.GA30511@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e7ab90e9-6cfd-a926-196b-0018184d6f92@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 08:44:53PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 23/01/2017 19:44, Richard Cochran wrote:
> >> device clock |sample1P,deviceclock| |sample2P,deviceclock|
> >> -------------------------------------------------------------
> >> realtime clock |sample1P,realtimeclock| |sample2P,realtimeclock|
> >
> > Are |sample1P,deviceclock| and |sample1P,realtimeclock| taken at the
> > same instant in time?
> >
> > If not, then calling that PTP_SYS_OFFSET_PRECISE is misleading.
>
> Yes, of course. This was added for the e1000e drivers first, but chrony
> isn't using it yet. In the case of KVM, the same host TSC value is used
> to produce the host clock and (converted to guest TSC) the guest clock.
>
> If you just implement getclock64 the PTP_SYS_OFFSET output:
>
> device clock | |sample2| |sample4| |sample6| ...
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> realtime clock |sample1| |sample3| |sample5|
>
> has a very large distance between samples on the same line (about 1 us),
> and I think it is too noisy for userspace to make sense of the output.
>
> So, on one hand chrony only uses the mean of realtime clock samples, in
> an attempt to produce precise cross timestamps. On the other hand, even
> though KVM could produce those natively, chrony does not support
> PTP_SYS_OFFSET_PRECISE.
>
> Marcelo's patch then produces fake realtime clock samples that, however,
> let chrony derive the cross timestamps that KVM produced in the first
> place. The outcome is really great accuracy compared to previous
> versions of the patch, often just +/- 2 or 3 nanoseconds.
>
> Paolo
Nope, the clock offset is the value inside square brackets. The +/-
is the error. So the clock offset is actually up to 680ns.
Yes for greater accuracy userspace should implement _PRECISE
support.
I'm resending v5 with native support for ->gettime and
->getcrosststamps.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-24 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-20 12:20 [patch 0/5] KVM virtual PTP driver (v3) Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-20 12:20 ` [patch 1/5] KVM: x86: provide realtime host clock via vsyscall notifiers Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-20 12:20 ` [patch 2/5] KVM: x86: add KVM_HC_CLOCK_OFFSET hypercall Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-20 12:20 ` [patch 3/5] kvmclock: export kvmclock clocksource pointer Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-20 12:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-01-20 12:20 ` [patch 4/5] PTP: add PTP_SYS_OFFSET emulation via cross timestamps infrastructure Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-20 12:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-01-20 13:07 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-20 13:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-01-20 13:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-20 14:02 ` Radim Krcmar
2017-01-20 14:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-01-20 14:31 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2017-01-20 18:30 ` Radim Krcmar
2017-01-20 20:25 ` Richard Cochran
2017-01-23 13:19 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-23 18:44 ` Richard Cochran
2017-01-23 19:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-01-24 5:43 ` Richard Cochran
2017-01-24 11:23 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2017-01-24 11:35 ` Richard Cochran
2017-01-23 23:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-24 5:32 ` Richard Cochran
2017-01-24 8:15 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2017-01-20 12:20 ` [patch 5/5] PTP: add kvm PTP driver Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-20 12:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-01-20 13:11 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-20 14:12 ` Radim Krcmar
2017-01-20 14:20 ` Radim Krcmar
2017-01-20 15:00 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-20 17:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-01-20 18:08 ` Radim Krcmar
2017-01-20 19:10 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-21 8:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-01-20 13:10 ` [patch 0/5] KVM virtual PTP driver (v3) Paolo Bonzini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-01-20 14:51 [patch 0/5] KVM virtual PTP driver (v4) Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-20 14:51 ` [patch 4/5] PTP: add PTP_SYS_OFFSET emulation via cross timestamps infrastructure Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170124112326.GA30511@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlichvar@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).