From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: "Su, David W" <david.w.su@intel.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Long interrupt latency in guest
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 19:03:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170130180330.GA4867@potion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3875C02542CA2945BF761013C1F5B8E57F3DDD50@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com>
2017-01-25 23:57+0000, Su, David W:
> We use vfio-pci to expose a NIC device to a guest and a packet generator generating time stamped packets to measure latency. The NIC is programmed to generate an interrupt when it receives a packet. qemu cpu thread is bound to a fixed CPU core and the NIC interrupts are bound to the same core. The host CPU supports APIC virtualization. We have observed sometimes an interrupt is delayed for a relatively long time (mini seconds) before being delivered to the guest.
>
> It seems there is a small window in the function vcpu_enter_guest in arch/x86/kvm/x86.c, where an interrupt from a device managed by vfio-pci is queued in PIR after PIR has synchronized to VIRR. This will cause the interrupt not delivered to the guest until the next VM exit-entry cycle. Refer to the code snippet below, if a device interrupt arrives after the KVM_REQ_EVENT check block and before local_irq_disable(), the interrupt request will be in PIR but not in VIRR. In a worst case scenario, the interrupt would get lost if another interrupt from the device arrived before a VM exit occurred.
Good analysis.
> /*
> * KVM_REQ_EVENT is not set when posted interrupts are set by
> * VT-d hardware, so we have to update RVI unconditionally.
> */
> if (kvm_lapic_enabled(vcpu)) {
> /*
> * Update architecture specific hints for APIC
> * virtual interrupt delivery.
> */
> if (kvm_x86_ops->hwapic_irr_update)
> kvm_x86_ops->hwapic_irr_update(vcpu,
> kvm_lapic_find_highest_irr(vcpu));
> }
>
> if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu) || req_int_win) {
>
> ...
> ...
> ...
>
> local_irq_disable();
>
> if (vcpu->mode == EXITING_GUEST_MODE || vcpu->requests
> || need_resched() || signal_pending(current)) {
>
>
> Moving the "if (kvm_lapic_enabled(vcpu))" block to after the "if (vcpu->mode == EXITING_GUEST_MODE ..." block resolved the long interrupt latency issue in my limited testing, but I'm not sure if this is going to break something else.
hwapic_irr_update() or kvm_lapic_find_highest_irr() might set
vcpu->requests, so they should be just after local_irq_disable().
A drawback is that kvm_lapic_find_highest_irr() sets KVM_REQ_EVENT on
every PIR sync and thus forces useless re-runs of vcpu_enter_guest().
Paolo's pending patches eliminated the useless KVM_REQ_EVENT and also
moved the update just after local_irq_disable().
(Without noticing that it fixes a bug.)
Please verify that the delay goes away with patches from
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/12/19/352
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-30 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-25 23:57 Long interrupt latency in guest Su, David W
2017-01-30 18:03 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170130180330.GA4867@potion \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=david.w.su@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox