public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Matthew Giassa <matthew@giassa.net>,
	"kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com"
	<kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Introduction + new project: "rootkit detection using virtualization".
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:41:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170213084115.GA16815@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486777021.2096.36.camel@redhat.com>

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 08:37:01PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> One of the things that Matthew can do is build on
> the read-only memory protections in the kernel, and
> have the hypervisor enforce that the memory the kernel
> marks as read-only is never written from inside the
> virtual machine, until the next reboot.
> 
> That seems like it might be a useful place to start,
> since it would immediately make the other read-only
> protections that people are working on much harder to
> get around, at least inside virtual machines.

I agree that this is valuable, but it feels like doing so probably 
involves designing a consistent mechanism for lightweight 
kernel→hypervisor calls - the existing vfio framework seems heavier than 
necessary for this kind of thing. Going further probably involves having 
a good way for syscalls to call into the hypervisor, but again finding a 
generic solution that doesn't add too much overhead seems like a good 
plan. My implementation of this was very special cased and didn't 
attempt to do anything in a generic way, so I'm definitely not a good 
model!

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

      reply	other threads:[~2017-02-13  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-10 22:00 Introduction + new project: "rootkit detection using virtualization" Matthew Giassa
2017-02-10 23:14 ` Jidong Xiao
2017-02-10 23:18 ` Jidong Xiao
2017-02-11  3:21   ` Matthew Giassa
2017-02-11  3:43     ` Jidong Xiao
2017-02-14 18:06       ` Matthew Giassa
2017-02-14 21:25         ` Steve Rutherford
2017-02-15  3:31           ` Matthew Giassa
2017-02-16  6:31             ` Grandhi, Sainath
2017-02-17  1:16               ` Matthew Giassa
2017-02-10 23:27 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-02-10 23:31   ` Kees Cook
2017-02-11  1:37   ` Rik van Riel
2017-02-13  8:41     ` Matthew Garrett [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170213084115.GA16815@srcf.ucam.org \
    --to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@giassa.net \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox