From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/paravirt: Don't make vcpu_is_preempted() a callee-save function Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 23:31:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20170213223130.GL6500@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1486741389-8513-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> <20170210161928.GI6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1c949ed0-1b88-ae6e-4e6c-426502bfab5f@redhat.com> <14854496-0baa-1bf6-c819-f3d7fae13c2c@redhat.com> <20170213104716.GM6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20170213105343.GJ6536@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <19008130-7b73-5c53-3cb5-a013e9e5552b@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Juergen Gross , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Boris Ostrovsky , Pan Xinhui , Paolo Bonzini , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Chris Wright , Ingo Molnar , hpa@zytor.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Alok Kataria , Thomas Gleixner To: Waiman Long Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <19008130-7b73-5c53-3cb5-a013e9e5552b@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 05:24:36PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > >> movsql %edi, %rax; > >> movq __per_cpu_offset(,%rax,8), %rax; > >> cmpb $0, %[offset](%rax); > >> setne %al; > I have thought of that too. However, the goal is to eliminate memory > read/write from/to stack. Eliminating a register sign-extend instruction > won't help much in term of performance. Problem here is that all instructions have dependencies, so if you can get rid of the sign extend mov you kill a bunch of stall cycles (I would expect). But yes, peanuts vs the stack load/stores.