From: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
He Ch
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
lguest@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/4] KVM: VMX: Simplify segment_base
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:54:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170216215438.126111-4-thgarnie@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170216215438.126111-1-thgarnie@google.com>
The KVM segment_base function is confusing. This patch replaces integers
with appropriate flags, simplify constructs and add comments.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>
---
Based on next-20170213
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 99167f20bc34..91e619269128 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -2060,27 +2060,37 @@ static bool update_transition_efer(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, int efer_offset)
static unsigned long segment_base(u16 selector)
{
struct desc_struct *d;
- unsigned long table_base;
+ struct desc_struct *table_base;
unsigned long v;
+ u32 high32;
- if (!(selector & ~3))
+ if (!(selector & ~SEGMENT_RPL_MASK))
return 0;
- table_base = get_current_gdt_rw_vaddr();
-
- if (selector & 4) { /* from ldt */
+ /* LDT selector */
+ if ((selector & SEGMENT_TI_MASK) == SEGMENT_LDT) {
u16 ldt_selector = kvm_read_ldt();
- if (!(ldt_selector & ~3))
+ if (!(ldt_selector & ~SEGMENT_RPL_MASK))
return 0;
- table_base = segment_base(ldt_selector);
+ table_base = (struct desc_struct *)segment_base(ldt_selector);
+ } else {
+ table_base = get_current_gdt_rw();
}
- d = (struct desc_struct *)(table_base + (selector & ~7));
+
+ d = table_base + (selector >> 3);
v = get_desc_base(d);
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
- if (d->s == 0 && (d->type == 2 || d->type == 9 || d->type == 11))
- v |= ((unsigned long)((struct ldttss_desc64 *)d)->base3) << 32;
+ /*
+ * Extend the virtual address if we have a system descriptor entry for
+ * LDT or TSS (available or busy).
+ */
+ if (d->s == 0 && (d->type == DESC_LDT || d->type == DESC_TSS ||
+ d->type == 11/*Busy TSS */)) {
+ high32 = ((struct ldttss_desc64 *)d)->base3;
+ v |= (u64)high32 << 32;
+ }
#endif
return v;
}
--
2.11.0.483.g087da7b7c-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-16 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-16 21:54 [PATCH v4 1/4] x86/mm: Adapt MODULES_END based on Fixmap section size Thomas Garnier
2017-02-16 21:54 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] x86: Remap GDT tables in the Fixmap section Thomas Garnier
2017-02-16 21:54 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] x86: Make the GDT remapping read-only on 64-bit Thomas Garnier
2017-02-16 21:54 ` Thomas Garnier [this message]
2017-02-17 0:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] x86/mm: Adapt MODULES_END based on Fixmap section size kbuild test robot
2017-02-17 0:45 ` kbuild test robot
2017-02-17 16:00 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-02-17 20:52 ` Thomas Garnier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170216215438.126111-4-thgarnie@google.com \
--to=thgarnie@google.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=lguest@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox