From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] KVM: change API for requests to match bit operations
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:01:20 +0100
Message-ID: <20170217150120.GB28391@potion>
References: <20170216160449.13094-1-rkrcmar@redhat.com>
 <20170216160449.13094-2-rkrcmar@redhat.com>
 <20170217103014.5ada1f1c.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
        James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
        Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
To: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170217103014.5ada1f1c.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

2017-02-17 10:30+0100, Cornelia Huck:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:04:45 +0100
> Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> kvm_make_request was a wrapper that added barriers to bit_set and
>> kvm_check_request did the same for bit_test and bit_check, but the name
>> was not very obvious and we were also lacking operations that cover
>> bit_test and bit_clear, which resulted in an inconsistent use.
>> 
>> The renaming:
>>   kvm_request_set            <- kvm_make_request
>>   kvm_request_test_and_clear <- kvm_check_request
>> 
>> Automated with coccinelle script:
>>   @@
>>   expression VCPU, REQ;
>>   @@
>>   -kvm_make_request(REQ, VCPU)
>>   +kvm_request_set(REQ, VCPU)
>> 
>>   @@
>>   expression VCPU, REQ;
>>   @@
>>   -kvm_check_request(REQ, VCPU)
>>   +kvm_request_test_and_clear(REQ, VCPU)
> 
> Forgot your s-o-b?

Oops, thanks.

>> +static inline void kvm_request_set(unsigned req, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> 
> Should we make req unsigned long as well, so that it matches the bit
> api even more?

>>From the discussion that followed, I'll keep unsigned.