From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] s390: convert debug_info.ref_count from atomic_t to refcount_t Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:39:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20170220133914.GQ6500@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1487588781-15123-1-git-send-email-elena.reshetova@intel.com> <1487588781-15123-2-git-send-email-elena.reshetova@intel.com> <20170220132424.GA5656@osiris> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Elena Reshetova , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, davem@davemloft.net, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, tony.luck@intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, Hans Liljestrand , Kees Cook , David Windsor To: Heiko Carstens Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170220132424.GA5656@osiris> Sender: sparclinux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 02:24:24PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 01:06:18PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote: > > @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ debug_info_create(const char *name, int pages_per_area, int nr_areas, > > debug_area_last = rc; > > rc->next = NULL; > > > > - debug_info_get(rc); > > + refcount_set(&rc->ref_count, 1); > > This is not wrong, but I will remove this hunk before applying your patch, > since this doesn't look like an obvious correct change at first glance. I suspect; but have not looked at the code; that this would otherwise attempt to do a 0 -> 1 increment, which refcount_inc() will refuse (and WARN) over.