From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] KVM: add KVM request variants without barrier Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:50:29 +0100 Message-ID: <20170223155029.GC8342@potion> References: <20170216160449.13094-1-rkrcmar@redhat.com> <20170216160449.13094-3-rkrcmar@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Jones , Marc Zyngier , Christian Borntraeger , Cornelia Huck , James Hogan , Paul Mackerras , Christoffer Dall To: Paolo Bonzini Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34460 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751156AbdBWPuf (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:50:35 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2017-02-23 11:57+0100, Paolo Bonzini: > On 16/02/2017 17:04, Radim Krčmář wrote: >> + >> +static inline void __kvm_request_clear(unsigned req, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> +{ >> + test_bit(req, &vcpu->requests); >> } > > Are you sure? :) No, as always. :)