From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: add KVM request variants without barrier Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 10:26:27 +0800 Message-ID: <20170302022627.GJ13926@pxdev.xzpeter.org> References: <20170224195002.28030-1-rkrcmar@redhat.com> <20170224195002.28030-3-rkrcmar@redhat.com> <20170228073424.GL10022@pxdev.xzpeter.org> <20170228074051.GM10022@pxdev.xzpeter.org> <20170301170248.GD20547@potion> <20170302011533.GI13926@pxdev.xzpeter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Andrew Jones , Marc Zyngier , Christian Borntraeger , Cornelia Huck , James Hogan , Paul Mackerras , Christoffer Dall , David Hildenbrand To: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34938 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753448AbdCBCf4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2017 21:35:56 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170302011533.GI13926@pxdev.xzpeter.org> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 09:15:33AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote: [...] > Meanwhile, I think it's still worthwhile to go through the patch even > it's from cocinelle since sometimes coccinelle might do something that > we (or only me?) didn't expect. E.g., afaik it cannot handle well with > over-80-chars lines, so we need to wrap them on our own (I got a patch > from the author though to fix this, but not yet tested). Sorry I should definitely mention that that issue only exists in special conditions, iirc like printf("string1" "string2") and when the strings are very long, since I believe in most cases coccinelle works perfectly well. Thanks, -- peterx