From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] basic vfio-ccw infrastructure Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:20:16 +0200 Message-ID: <20170328102016.4926f21d.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> References: <20170317031743.40128-1-bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, renxiaof@linux.vnet.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, agraf@suse.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: Dong Jia Shi Return-path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:46738 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754508AbdC1IUf (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 04:20:35 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v2S8InMe094952 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 04:20:24 -0400 Received: from e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.107]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 29fm6r03c4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 04:20:24 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:20:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170317031743.40128-1-bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 04:17:27 +0100 Dong Jia Shi wrote: > Dong Jia Shi (16): > s390: cio: introduce cio_cancel_halt_clear > s390: cio: export more interfaces > vfio: ccw: define device_api strings > vfio: ccw: basic implementation for vfio_ccw driver > vfio: ccw: introduce channel program interfaces > vfio: ccw: register vfio_ccw to the mediated device framework > vfio: ccw: introduce ccw_io_region > vfio: ccw: handle ccw command request > vfio: ccw: realize VFIO_DEVICE_GET_REGION_INFO ioctl > vfio: ccw: realize VFIO_DEVICE_RESET ioctl > vfio: ccw: realize VFIO_DEVICE_G(S)ET_IRQ_INFO ioctls > vfio: ccw: return I/O results asynchronously > vfio: ccw: introduce a finite state machine > docs: add documentation for vfio-ccw > vfio: ccw: introduce support for ccw0 > MAINTAINERS: Add vfio-ccw maintainers > > Documentation/s390/00-INDEX | 2 + > Documentation/s390/vfio-ccw.txt | 303 +++++++++++++ > MAINTAINERS | 10 + > arch/s390/Kconfig | 10 + > arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h | 18 + > arch/s390/include/asm/isc.h | 1 + > drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 8 + > drivers/s390/cio/Makefile | 3 + > drivers/s390/cio/cio.c | 69 +++ > drivers/s390/cio/cio.h | 1 + > drivers/s390/cio/device_fsm.c | 54 +-- > drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 842 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h | 42 ++ > drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c | 308 +++++++++++++ > drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c | 207 +++++++++ > drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c | 447 +++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h | 96 ++++ > include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 18 + > include/uapi/linux/vfio_ccw.h | 24 + > 19 files changed, 2417 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/s390/vfio-ccw.txt > create mode 100644 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c > create mode 100644 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h > create mode 100644 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c > create mode 100644 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c > create mode 100644 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c > create mode 100644 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h > create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/vfio_ccw.h > Patch set looks good to me, and I think we should target it for the next merge window (the interface looks fine, and we can iron out any other things later.) Question: Which tree should this go through? Vfio or kvm/s390?