From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, eric.auger@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, slp@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] vfio/type1: Remove locked page accounting workqueue
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:14:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170412041426.GC16464@pxdev.xzpeter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170411192644.2131.68702.stgit@gimli.home>
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 01:28:06PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> If the mmap_sem is contented then the vfio type1 IOMMU backend will
> defer locked page accounting updates to a workqueue task. This has a
> few problems and depending on which side the user tries to play, they
> might be over-penalized for unmaps that haven't yet been accounted or
> race the workqueue to enter more mappings than they're allowed. The
> original intent of this workqueue mechanism seems to be focused on
> reducing latency through the ioctl, but we cannot do so at the cost
> of correctness. Remove this workqueue mechanism and update the
> callers to allow for failure. We can also now recheck the limit under
> write lock to make sure we don't exceed it.
>
> vfio_pin_pages_remote() also now necessarily includes an unwind path
> which we can jump to directly if the consecutive page pinning finds
> that we're exceeding the user's memory limits. This avoids the
> current lazy approach which does accounting and mapping up to the
> fault, only to return an error on the next iteration to unwind the
> entire vfio_dma.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-12 4:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-11 19:28 [PATCH v3] vfio/type1: Remove locked page accounting workqueue Alex Williamson
2017-04-12 4:14 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2017-04-12 12:05 ` Auger Eric
2017-04-14 19:21 ` Kirti Wankhede
2017-04-14 20:58 ` Alex Williamson
2017-04-14 22:00 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170412041426.GC16464@pxdev.xzpeter.org \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slp@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox