From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: alex.williamson@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: eric.auger@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, peterx@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, slp@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/3] vfio/type1: Prune vfio_pin_page_external()
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 16:38:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170417223804.25720.4068.stgit@gimli.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170417223158.25720.59453.stgit@gimli.home>
With vfio_lock_acct() testing the locked memory limit under mmap_sem,
it's redundant to do it here for a single page. We can also reorder
our tests such that we can avoid testing for reserved pages if we're
not doing accounting and let vfio_lock_acct() test the process
CAP_IPC_LOCK. Finally, this function oddly returns 1 on success.
Update to return zero on success, -errno on error. Since the function
only pins a single page, there's no need to return the number of pages
pinned.
N.B. vfio_pin_pages_remote() can pin a large contiguous range of pages
before calling vfio_lock_acct(). If we were to similarly remove the
extra test there, a user could temporarily pin far more pages than
they're allowed.
Suggested-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
Suggested-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
---
drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 35 ++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index a8a079ba9477..372e4f626138 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -482,43 +482,26 @@ static long vfio_unpin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma, dma_addr_t iova,
static int vfio_pin_page_external(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
unsigned long *pfn_base, bool do_accounting)
{
- unsigned long limit;
- bool lock_cap = has_capability(dma->task, CAP_IPC_LOCK);
struct mm_struct *mm;
int ret;
- bool rsvd;
mm = get_task_mm(dma->task);
if (!mm)
return -ENODEV;
ret = vaddr_get_pfn(mm, vaddr, dma->prot, pfn_base);
- if (ret)
- goto pin_page_exit;
-
- rsvd = is_invalid_reserved_pfn(*pfn_base);
- limit = task_rlimit(dma->task, RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-
- if (!rsvd && !lock_cap && mm->locked_vm + 1 > limit) {
- put_pfn(*pfn_base, dma->prot);
- pr_warn("%s: Task %s (%d) RLIMIT_MEMLOCK (%ld) exceeded\n",
- __func__, dma->task->comm, task_pid_nr(dma->task),
- limit << PAGE_SHIFT);
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto pin_page_exit;
- }
-
- if (!rsvd && do_accounting) {
- ret = vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, 1, &lock_cap);
+ if (!ret && do_accounting && !is_invalid_reserved_pfn(*pfn_base)) {
+ ret = vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, 1, NULL);
if (ret) {
put_pfn(*pfn_base, dma->prot);
- goto pin_page_exit;
+ if (ret == -ENOMEM)
+ pr_warn("%s: Task %s (%d) RLIMIT_MEMLOCK "
+ "(%ld) exceeded\n", __func__,
+ dma->task->comm, task_pid_nr(dma->task),
+ task_rlimit(dma->task, RLIMIT_MEMLOCK));
}
}
- ret = 1;
-
-pin_page_exit:
mmput(mm);
return ret;
}
@@ -598,10 +581,8 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_pin_pages(void *iommu_data,
remote_vaddr = dma->vaddr + iova - dma->iova;
ret = vfio_pin_page_external(dma, remote_vaddr, &phys_pfn[i],
do_accounting);
- if (ret <= 0) {
- WARN_ON(!ret);
+ if (ret)
goto pin_unwind;
- }
ret = vfio_add_to_pfn_list(dma, iova, phys_pfn[i]);
if (ret) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-17 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-17 22:37 [PATCH v5 0/3] vfio/type1: Synchronous locked page accounting Alex Williamson
2017-04-17 22:37 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] vfio/type1: Remove locked page accounting workqueue Alex Williamson
2017-04-17 22:38 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2017-04-17 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] vfio/type1: Reduce repetitive calls in vfio_pin_pages_remote() Alex Williamson
2017-04-18 4:23 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] vfio/type1: Synchronous locked page accounting Peter Xu
2017-04-18 18:50 ` Kirti Wankhede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170417223804.25720.4068.stgit@gimli.home \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=slp@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox