public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
To: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] KVM: perform a wake_up in kvm_make_all_cpus_request
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:06:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170427140655.40eebb34.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170426203227.12321-6-rkrcmar@redhat.com>

On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 22:32:23 +0200
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> wrote:

> We want to have kvm_make_all_cpus_request() to be an optmized version of
> 
>   kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
>     kvm_make_request(vcpu, request);
>     kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
>   }
> 
> and kvm_vcpu_kick() wakes up the target vcpu.  We know which requests do
> not need the wake up and use it to optimize the loop.
> 
> Thanks to that, this patch doesn't change the behavior of current users
> (the all don't need the wake up) and only prepares for future where the

s/the all/they all/

> wake up is going to be needed.
> 
> I think that most requests do not need the wake up, so we would flip the
> bit then.
> 
> kvm_vcpu_kick() will get this condition after it is merged with
> kvm_make_request() because we currently don't know which request is being
> kicked.

I find this sentence confusing: not all kicks are directly related to
requests.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index e5d52b46b531..3772f7dcc72d 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -186,6 +186,9 @@ bool kvm_make_all_cpus_request(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int req)
>  		/* Set ->requests bit before we read ->mode. */
>  		smp_mb__after_atomic();
> 
> +		if (!(req & KVM_REQUEST_NO_WAKEUP))
> +			kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu);
> +
>  		if (cpus != NULL && cpu != -1 && cpu != me &&
>  		      kvm_vcpu_exiting_guest_mode(vcpu) != OUTSIDE_GUEST_MODE)
>  			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpus);

The code change looks good to me.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-27 12:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-26 20:32 [PATCH v2 0/9] KVM: towards maintainable kvm_make_all_cpus_request() Radim Krčmář
2017-04-26 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] KVM: add kvm_{test,clear}_request to replace {test,clear}_bit Radim Krčmář
2017-04-27 11:33   ` Andrew Jones
2017-04-27 11:38   ` Cornelia Huck
2017-04-26 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] KVM: x86: always use kvm_make_request instead of set_bit Radim Krčmář
2017-04-27 11:33   ` Andrew Jones
2017-04-26 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] KVM: remove #ifndef CONFIG_S390 around kvm_vcpu_wake_up Radim Krčmář
2017-04-27 11:45   ` Cornelia Huck
2017-05-03 16:05   ` Radim Krčmář
2017-05-03 16:16   ` [PATCH v3] " Radim Krčmář
2017-05-03 17:04     ` Cornelia Huck
2017-04-26 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] KVM: mark requests that do not need a wakeup Radim Krčmář
2017-04-27 11:35   ` Andrew Jones
2017-04-27 12:00   ` Cornelia Huck
2017-04-26 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] KVM: perform a wake_up in kvm_make_all_cpus_request Radim Krčmář
2017-04-27 11:36   ` Andrew Jones
2017-04-27 12:06   ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2017-04-27 12:15     ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-04-26 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] KVM: add explicit barrier to kvm_vcpu_kick Radim Krčmář
2017-04-26 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] KVM: improve arch vcpu request defining Radim Krčmář
2017-04-27 12:11   ` Cornelia Huck
2017-04-26 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] KVM: return if kvm_vcpu_wake_up() did wake up the VCPU Radim Krčmář
2017-04-27 11:41   ` Andrew Jones
2017-04-26 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] KVM: mark requests that need synchronization Radim Krčmář
2017-04-27 11:55   ` Andrew Jones
2017-04-27 12:36   ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170427140655.40eebb34.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
    --to=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cdall@linaro.org \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox