From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix KVM_SET_CLOCK relative to setting correct clock value
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 10:40:57 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170503134057.GA10468@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2499ef65-1dfe-8460-ec41-661b05cc5023@redhat.com>
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 03:08:46PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 02/05/2017 23:36, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > In the masterclock enabled case, kvmclock_offset must be adjusted so
> > that user_ns.clock = master_kernel_ns + kvmclock_offset (that is, the
> > value set from KVM_SET_CLOCK is the one visible at system_timestamp).
> >
> > This way the guest clock:
> >
> > 1. Starts counting when KVM_SET_CLOCK executes.
> > 2. With the value provided by userspace.
>
> So this fixes rounding errors?
No. It just does the correct
"user_ns.clock = master_kernel_ns + kvmclock_offset = return value of
get_kvmclock_ns(kvm) at moment of KVM_SET_CLOCK"
(that is, when guest_rdtsc() == tsc_timestamp, so guest_rdtsc() - tsc_timestamp = 0,
you want get_kvmclock_ns() to return user_ns.clock).
Its not a rounding error.
> > - now_ns = get_kvmclock_ns(kvm);
> > - kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset += user_ns.clock - now_ns;
> > +
> > kvm_gen_update_masterclock(kvm);
> > + if (ka->use_master_clock) {
> > + /*
> > + * In the masterclock enabled case,
> > + * kvmclock_offset must be adjusted so that
> > + * user_ns.clock = master_kernel_ns + kvmclock_offset
> > + * (that is, the value set from KVM_SET_CLOCK is the
> > + * one visible at system_timestamp).
> > + */
> > + kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset = user_ns.clock -
> > + ka->master_kernel_ns;
> > +
>
>
> This needs to hold ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock, I think.
>
> > + kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
> > + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu);
>
> kvm_gen_update_masterclock already does that, why did you move that to
> before the assignment?
Its after the assignment of kvmclock_offset because
KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATES processing by vcpus make use of kvmclock_offset.
So if you change that value, you have to request the vcpus to
recalculate their kvmclock areas using the new kvmclock_offset.
Resending v2, thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-03 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-02 21:36 [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix KVM_SET_CLOCK relative to setting correct clock value Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-03 13:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-03 13:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2017-05-03 13:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-03 18:24 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-03 13:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-10 18:04 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-05-11 15:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-12 14:13 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-05-12 14:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-12 15:31 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-12 17:37 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-05-13 3:46 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-15 16:19 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-05-15 21:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170503134057.GA10468@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox