public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix KVM_SET_CLOCK relative to setting correct clock value
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 10:40:57 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170503134057.GA10468@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2499ef65-1dfe-8460-ec41-661b05cc5023@redhat.com>

On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 03:08:46PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 02/05/2017 23:36, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > In the masterclock enabled case, kvmclock_offset must be adjusted so
> > that user_ns.clock = master_kernel_ns + kvmclock_offset (that is, the
> > value set from KVM_SET_CLOCK is the one visible at system_timestamp).
> > 
> > This way the guest clock:
> > 
> > 	1. Starts counting when KVM_SET_CLOCK executes.
> > 	2. With the value provided by userspace.
> 
> So this fixes rounding errors?

No. It just does the correct 

"user_ns.clock = master_kernel_ns + kvmclock_offset = return value of
get_kvmclock_ns(kvm) at moment of KVM_SET_CLOCK" 

(that is, when guest_rdtsc() == tsc_timestamp, so guest_rdtsc() - tsc_timestamp = 0, 
you want get_kvmclock_ns() to return user_ns.clock).

Its not a rounding error.

> > -		now_ns = get_kvmclock_ns(kvm);
> > -		kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset += user_ns.clock - now_ns;
> > +
> >  		kvm_gen_update_masterclock(kvm);
> > +		if (ka->use_master_clock) {
> > +			/*
> > +			 * In the masterclock enabled case,
> > +			 * kvmclock_offset must be adjusted so that
> > +			 * user_ns.clock = master_kernel_ns + kvmclock_offset
> > +			 * (that is, the value set from KVM_SET_CLOCK is the
> > +			 * one visible at system_timestamp).
> > +			 */
> > +			kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset = user_ns.clock -
> > +							ka->master_kernel_ns;
> > +
> 
> 
> This needs to hold ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock, I think.
> 
> > +			kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
> > +				kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu);
> 
> kvm_gen_update_masterclock already does that, why did you move that to
> before the assignment?

Its after the assignment of kvmclock_offset because
KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATES processing by vcpus make use of kvmclock_offset.

So if you change that value, you have to request the vcpus to
recalculate their kvmclock areas using the new kvmclock_offset.

Resending v2, thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-03 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-02 21:36 [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix KVM_SET_CLOCK relative to setting correct clock value Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-03 13:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-03 13:40   ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2017-05-03 13:55     ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-03 18:24       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-03 13:43   ` [PATCH v2] " Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-10 18:04     ` Radim Krčmář
2017-05-11 15:39       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-12 14:13         ` Radim Krčmář
2017-05-12 14:36           ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-12 15:31           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-12 17:37             ` Radim Krčmář
2017-05-13  3:46               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-15 16:19                 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-05-15 21:06                   ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170503134057.GA10468@amt.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox