public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: fix KVM_SET_CLOCK relative to setting correct clock value
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 12:31:03 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170512153101.GA1848@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170512141322.GC2173@potion>

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 04:13:23PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2017-05-11 12:39-0300, Marcelo Tosatti:
> > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 08:04:31PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> > > 2017-05-03 10:43-0300, Marcelo Tosatti:
> > > and the important fix for kvm master clock is the move of
> > > kvm_gen_update_masterclock() before we read the time.
> 
> > > The rest is just a minor optimization that also ignores time since
> > > master_kernel_ns() and therefore pins user_ns.clock to a slightly
> > > earlier time.
> > > 
> > > But all attention was given to the "minor optimization" -- have I missed
> > > something about the direct use of ka->master_kernel_ns?
> > 
> > I haven't attempted to optimize anything. Not sure what you mean.
> 
> I mean, why doesn't the patch look like this?
d 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 464da936c53d..8db1d09e59d7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -4175,9 +4175,10 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
>  			goto out;
>  
>  		r = 0;
> +		kvm_gen_update_masterclock(kvm);
>  		now_ns = get_kvmclock_ns(kvm);
>  		kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset += user_ns.clock - now_ns;
> -		kvm_gen_update_masterclock(kvm);
> +		kvm_make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE);
>  		break;

        now_ns = ka->master_kernel_ns + kvmclock_offset_prev + (grdtsc() - ka->master_cycle_now)
        kvmclock_offset += user_ns.clock - (ka->master_kernel_ns + kvmclock_offset_prev + (grdtsc() - ka->master_cycle_now)
        kvmclock_offset = kvmclock_offset_prev + user_ns.clock - (ka->master_kernel_ns + kvmclock_offset_prev + (grdtsc() - ka->master_cycle_now)

In case of VM was just initialized before migration, kvmclock_offset_prev is -ktime_get_boot_ns()

        kvmclock_offset = -ktime_get_boot_ns() + user_ns.clock - (ka->master_kernel_ns -ktime_get_boot_ns() + grdtsc() - ka->master_cycle_now))

But master_kernel_ns = ktime_get_boot_ns()     +  delta-between-vm-init-and-KVM_SET_CLOCK (AKA delta)
                    (the same one from VM init) 

        kvmclock_offset = -ktime_get_boot_ns() + user_ns.clock - (ktime_get_boot_ns() + delta + -ktime_get_boot_ns() + grdtsc() - ka->master_cycle_now))

        kvmclock_offset = -ktime_get_boot_ns() + user_ns.clock - delta - grdtsc() + ka->master_cycle_now

But we don't want grdtsc() - ka->master_cycle_now in there.

Note: grdtsc() == guest read tsc.

Now with

+			kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset = user_ns.clock -
+							ka->master_kernel_ns;

What happens is that guest clock starts counting, via kernel timekeeper,
at the moment kvm_get_time_and_clockread() runs. If you add grdtsc() -
ka->master_cycle_now in there, you are mindfully counting clock twice
(first: kernel timekeeper, second: the TSC between the (grdtsc() -
ka->master_cycle_now) in question.

+			kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset =  -ktime_get_boot_ns() +user_ns.clock -delta

Note that (grdtsc() - ka->master_cycle_now) is susceptible to scheduling
etc.

Makes sense?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-05-12 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-02 21:36 [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix KVM_SET_CLOCK relative to setting correct clock value Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-03 13:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-03 13:40   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-03 13:55     ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-03 18:24       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-03 13:43   ` [PATCH v2] " Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-10 18:04     ` Radim Krčmář
2017-05-11 15:39       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-12 14:13         ` Radim Krčmář
2017-05-12 14:36           ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-12 15:31           ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2017-05-12 17:37             ` Radim Krčmář
2017-05-13  3:46               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-05-15 16:19                 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-05-15 21:06                   ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170512153101.GA1848@amt.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox