From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Williamson Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/8] VFIO: do pasid table binding Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 15:59:01 -0600 Message-ID: <20170512155901.011790b6@t450s.home> References: <1493201525-14418-1-git-send-email-yi.l.liu@intel.com> <1493201525-14418-7-git-send-email-yi.l.liu@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kevin.tian@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@intel.com, tianyu.lan@intel.com, jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com, "Liu, Yi L" To: "Liu, Yi L" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52774 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758660AbdELV7H (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 May 2017 17:59:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1493201525-14418-7-git-send-email-yi.l.liu@intel.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 18:12:03 +0800 "Liu, Yi L" wrote: > From: "Liu, Yi L" > > This patch adds IOCTL processing in vfio_iommu_type1 for > VFIO_IOMMU_SVM_BIND_TASK. Binds the PASID table bind by > calling iommu_ops->bind_pasid_table to link the whole > PASID table to pIOMMU. > > For VT-d, it is linking the guest PASID table to host pIOMMU. > This is key point to support SVM virtualization on VT-d. > > Signed-off-by: Liu, Yi L > --- > drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c > index b3cc33f..30b6d48 100644 > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c > @@ -1512,6 +1512,50 @@ static int vfio_domains_have_iommu_cache(struct vfio_iommu *iommu) > return ret; > } > > +struct vfio_svm_task { > + struct iommu_domain *domain; > + void *payload; > +}; > + > +static int bind_pasid_tbl_fn(struct device *dev, void *data) > +{ > + int ret = 0; > + struct vfio_svm_task *task = data; Maybe avoid "task" or use svm_task to differentiate from task_struct task used elsewhere in this file. > + struct pasid_table_info *pasidt_binfo; > + > + pasidt_binfo = task->payload; > + ret = iommu_bind_pasid_table(task->domain, dev, pasidt_binfo); > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int vfio_do_svm_task(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, void *data, > + int (*fn)(struct device *, void *)) > +{ > + int ret = 0; > + struct vfio_domain *d; > + struct vfio_group *g; > + struct vfio_svm_task task; > + > + task.payload = data; > + > + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock); > + > + list_for_each_entry(d, &iommu->domain_list, next) { > + list_for_each_entry(g, &d->group_list, next) { > + if (g->iommu_group != NULL) { Can it ever be NULL? > + task.domain = d->domain; > + ret = iommu_group_for_each_dev( > + g->iommu_group, &task, fn); > + if (ret != 0) > + break; > + } > + } > + } > + > + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock); > + return ret; > +} > + > static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data, > unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) > { > @@ -1582,6 +1626,34 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data, > > return copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &unmap, minsz) ? > -EFAULT : 0; > + } else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_SVM_BIND_TASK) { > + struct vfio_device_svm hdr; > + u8 *data = NULL; But it really should be a struct pasid_table_info. > + int ret = 0; > + > + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_svm, length); > + if (copy_from_user(&hdr, (void __user *)arg, minsz)) > + return -EFAULT; > + > + if (hdr.length == 0) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + data = memdup_user((void __user *)(arg + minsz), > + hdr.length); > + if (IS_ERR(data)) > + return PTR_ERR(data); > + > + switch (hdr.flags & VFIO_SVM_TYPE_MASK) { > + case VFIO_SVM_BIND_PASIDTBL: > + ret = vfio_do_svm_task(iommu, data, > + bind_pasid_tbl_fn); > + break; > + default: > + ret = -EINVAL; > + break; > + } > + kfree(data); > + return ret; > } > > return -ENOTTY;