From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 2/6] s390x: basic self test
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 15:35:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170516133511.GA10587@potion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170512105830.10604-3-david@redhat.com>
2017-05-12 12:58+0200, David Hildenbrand:
> Test if the general infrastructure is working. The test will fail until
> we have proper sclp console output.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/s390x/selftest.c b/s390x/selftest.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> +int main(int argc, char**argv)
> +{
> + report_prefix_push("selftest");
> +
> + if (argc != 3)
> + report_abort("Wrong number of arguments");
> +
> + if (strcmp(argv[0], "s390x/selftest.elf") != 0)
> + report_abort("wrong program name");
This is going to fail when executed as a standalone test (argv[0] would
be a temp file name). No point in checking, IMO.
> + if (strcmp(argv[1], "test") != 0)
> + report_abort("wrong parameter value");
> + if (strcmp(argv[2], "123") != 0)
> + report_abort("wrong parameter value");
> +
> + report("test true", true, 0);
^
It seems you'll be doing v2 -- please remove this zero in it.
(I'll prepare patch that check format of report in order to have
automatic notifications in the future. :])
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-16 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-12 10:58 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 0/6] s390x: basic test infrastructure David Hildenbrand
2017-05-12 10:58 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 1/6] s390x: initial infrastructure David Hildenbrand
2017-05-15 9:19 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-05-16 7:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-05-16 7:58 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-05-16 8:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-05-12 10:58 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 2/6] s390x: basic self test David Hildenbrand
2017-05-16 13:35 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2017-05-16 19:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-05-17 13:12 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-05-17 16:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-05-12 10:58 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 3/6] s390x: copy sclp.h and sclp-ascii.c from QEMU David Hildenbrand
2017-05-12 10:58 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 4/6] s390x: compile sclp-ascii.c David Hildenbrand
2017-05-12 10:58 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 5/6] s390x: wire up sclp console output David Hildenbrand
2017-05-12 10:58 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 6/6] MAINTAINERS: add s390x maintainers David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170516133511.GA10587@potion \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox