From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: vmx: Properly handle machine check during VM-entry
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 15:39:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170519133916.GB9960@potion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170518230239.86518-1-jmattson@google.com>
2017-05-18 16:02-0700, Jim Mattson:
> When bit 31 of the exit reason is set to indicate a VM-entry failure,
> only the exit reason and exit qualification fields are set. All other
> VM-exit information fields, including "VM-exit interruption
> information," are unmodified.
>
> Fixes: 00eba012d53e6 ("KVM: VMX: Refactor vmx_complete_atomic_exit()")
> Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index c6f4ad44aa95..e73977ec15df 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -8624,7 +8624,8 @@ static void vmx_complete_atomic_exit(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> exit_intr_info = vmx->exit_intr_info;
>
> /* Handle machine checks before interrupts are enabled */
> - if (is_machine_check(exit_intr_info))
> + if (vmx->exit_reason == EXIT_REASON_MCE_DURING_VMENTRY ||
> + is_machine_check(exit_intr_info))
> kvm_machine_check();
Don't we need a 'return;' afterwards?
(i.e. will kvm_machine_check() always kill us?)
> /* We need to handle NMIs before interrupts are enabled */
If kvm_machine_check() managed to return, then we could double-inject
NMI, because exit_intr_info was not updated.
> if (is_nmi(exit_intr_info)) {
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-19 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-18 23:02 [PATCH] kvm: vmx: Properly handle machine check during VM-entry Jim Mattson
2017-05-19 13:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-05-19 13:39 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2017-05-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v2] " Jim Mattson
2017-05-22 8:26 ` [PATCH] " Xiao Guangrong
2017-05-22 9:06 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-05-22 15:14 ` Jim Mattson
2017-05-22 16:04 ` Jim Mattson
2017-05-22 16:48 ` [PATCH v3] " Jim Mattson
2017-05-23 2:20 ` [PATCH] " Xiao Guangrong
2017-05-25 16:17 ` Jim Mattson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170519133916.GB9960@potion \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox