From: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@gmail.com>
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: x86: avoid large stack allocations in em_fxrstor
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 15:40:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170529224010.slebvm7ts6ki7llg@lostoracle.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170529203908.10775-1-nick.desaulniers@gmail.com>
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 01:39:08PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> + if (ctxt->mode < X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64) {
> + rc = asm_safe("fxsave %[fx]", , [fx] "+m"(fx_state));
> + if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
> + return rc;
> + /*
> + * Hardware doesn't save and restore XMM 0-7 without
> + * CR4.OSFXSR, but does save and restore MXCSR.
> + */
> + if (ctxt->ops->get_cr(ctxt, 4) & X86_CR4_OSFXSR)
> + size = offsetof(struct fxregs_state, xmm_space[8]);
> + else
> + size = offsetof(struct fxregs_state, xmm_space[0]);
> + } else if (ctxt->mode == X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64)
> + size = offsetof(struct fxregs_state, xmm_space[16]);
> +
> + if (size == 0)
> + return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
> +
> + rc = segmented_read_std(ctxt, ctxt->memop.addr.mem, &fx_state, size);
> if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
> return rc;
Thinking more about this, I think it may be more elegant to move the
segmented_read_std into the then/else branches above, remove
initialization of size, and remove the size == 0 check. Thoughts?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-29 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-24 6:24 [PATCH] KVM: x86: dynamically allocate large struct in em_fxrstor Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-24 14:19 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-05-25 1:36 ` Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-25 14:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-26 4:13 ` Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-26 7:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-29 19:55 ` [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: avoid large stack allocations " Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-29 20:14 ` kbuild test robot
2017-05-29 20:29 ` Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-29 20:39 ` [PATCH v3] " Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-29 22:40 ` Nick Desaulniers [this message]
2017-05-29 22:48 ` [PATCH v4] " Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-30 10:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-30 14:05 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-05-31 3:08 ` [PATCH v5] " Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-31 11:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-01 1:05 ` Nick Desaulniers
2017-06-01 7:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-02 2:10 ` Nick Desaulniers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170529224010.slebvm7ts6ki7llg@lostoracle.net \
--to=nick.desaulniers@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).