kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@gmail.com>
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: x86: avoid large stack allocations in em_fxrstor
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 15:40:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170529224010.slebvm7ts6ki7llg@lostoracle.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170529203908.10775-1-nick.desaulniers@gmail.com>

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 01:39:08PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> +	if (ctxt->mode < X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64) {
> +		rc = asm_safe("fxsave %[fx]", , [fx] "+m"(fx_state));
> +		if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
> +			return rc;
> +		/*
> +		 * Hardware doesn't save and restore XMM 0-7 without
> +		 * CR4.OSFXSR, but does save and restore MXCSR.
> +		 */
> +		if (ctxt->ops->get_cr(ctxt, 4) & X86_CR4_OSFXSR)
> +			size = offsetof(struct fxregs_state, xmm_space[8]);
> +		else
> +			size = offsetof(struct fxregs_state, xmm_space[0]);
> +	} else if (ctxt->mode == X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64)
> +		size = offsetof(struct fxregs_state, xmm_space[16]);
> +
> +	if (size == 0)
> +		return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
> +
> +	rc = segmented_read_std(ctxt, ctxt->memop.addr.mem, &fx_state, size);
>  	if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
>  		return rc;

Thinking more about this, I think it may be more elegant to move the
segmented_read_std into the then/else branches above, remove
initialization of size, and remove the size == 0 check.  Thoughts?

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-29 22:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-24  6:24 [PATCH] KVM: x86: dynamically allocate large struct in em_fxrstor Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-24 14:19 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-05-25  1:36   ` Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-25 14:07     ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-26  4:13       ` Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-26  7:18         ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-29 19:55           ` [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: avoid large stack allocations " Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-29 20:14             ` kbuild test robot
2017-05-29 20:29               ` Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-29 20:39             ` [PATCH v3] " Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-29 22:40               ` Nick Desaulniers [this message]
2017-05-29 22:48               ` [PATCH v4] " Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-30 10:15                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-30 14:05                   ` Radim Krčmář
2017-05-31  3:08                 ` [PATCH v5] " Nick Desaulniers
2017-05-31 11:01                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-01  1:05                     ` Nick Desaulniers
2017-06-01  7:36                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-02  2:10                         ` Nick Desaulniers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170529224010.slebvm7ts6ki7llg@lostoracle.net \
    --to=nick.desaulniers@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).