From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 1/2] arm/arm64: smp: cpu0 is special
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 17:12:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170602151252.32338-2-drjones@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170602151252.32338-1-drjones@redhat.com>
Unless cpu0 code explicitly calls do_idle(), then it never will,
and thus any on_cpu(0, ...) calls will hang. Let's assume that
if cpu0 hasn't already called do_idle() that the on_cpu(0, ...)
call from a secondary CPU was a programming error and assert.
However, it's possible the developer intends cpu0 to call do_idle
later, so give the developer a chance to disable the assert too.
Also, while cpu0 is special, it's not that special. It shouldn't
be the only CPU that can call on_cpus().
Finally, let's not mess with cpu0's idle state in on_cpus(), as
this could potentially confuse another CPU that's checking it.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
---
lib/arm/asm/smp.h | 2 ++
lib/arm/smp.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/arm/asm/smp.h b/lib/arm/asm/smp.h
index 4272e0fd9253..62d14b07bc51 100644
--- a/lib/arm/asm/smp.h
+++ b/lib/arm/asm/smp.h
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
#define smp_processor_id() (current_thread_info()->cpu)
+extern bool cpu0_calls_idle;
+
extern void halt(void);
extern void do_idle(void);
diff --git a/lib/arm/smp.c b/lib/arm/smp.c
index 7e3c91ce3b48..b4b43237e32e 100644
--- a/lib/arm/smp.c
+++ b/lib/arm/smp.c
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
#include <asm/psci.h>
#include <asm/smp.h>
+bool cpu0_calls_idle;
+
cpumask_t cpu_present_mask;
cpumask_t cpu_online_mask;
cpumask_t cpu_idle_mask;
@@ -81,6 +83,9 @@ void do_idle(void)
{
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ if (cpu == 0)
+ cpu0_calls_idle = true;
+
set_cpu_idle(cpu, true);
sev();
@@ -103,6 +108,9 @@ void on_cpu_async(int cpu, void (*func)(void *data), void *data)
return;
}
+ assert_msg(cpu != 0 || cpu0_calls_idle, "Waiting on CPU0, which is unlikely to idle. "
+ "If this is intended set cpu0_calls_idle=1");
+
spin_lock(&lock);
if (!cpu_online(cpu))
__smp_boot_secondary(cpu, do_idle);
@@ -133,17 +141,15 @@ void on_cpu(int cpu, void (*func)(void *data), void *data)
void on_cpus(void (*func)(void))
{
- int cpu;
+ int cpu, me = smp_processor_id();
for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
- if (cpu == 0)
+ if (cpu == me)
continue;
on_cpu_async(cpu, (on_cpu_func)func, NULL);
}
func();
- set_cpu_idle(0, true);
- while (!cpumask_full(&cpu_idle_mask))
+ while (cpumask_weight(&cpu_idle_mask) < nr_cpus - 1)
wfe();
- set_cpu_idle(0, false);
}
--
2.9.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-02 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-02 15:12 [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 0/2] arm/arm64: smp: on_cpu improvements Andrew Jones
2017-06-02 15:12 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2017-06-02 15:12 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 2/2] arm/arm64: smp: add deadlock detection Andrew Jones
2017-06-02 15:26 ` Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170602151252.32338-2-drjones@redhat.com \
--to=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).