From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] srcu: Allow use of Tiny/Tree SRCU from both process and interrupt context Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 08:59:47 -0700 Message-ID: <20170606155947.GF3721@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20170605220919.GA27820@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1496700591-30177-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170606110915.g7zlzoj5iidhpp7g@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20170606125357.GB3721@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170606155428.w25zbldvs2gtmv3r@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Paolo Bonzini , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds To: Peter Zijlstra Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170606155428.w25zbldvs2gtmv3r@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 05:54:28PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 05:53:57AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > So the only part of this patch that is needed is the changes to the > > comments, right? ;-) > > Right, although I would suggest putting that requirement (the balanced > lock vs unlock) somewhere as well. Good point! Otherwise, some one will decide it is a good idea to try sooner or later. Thnax, Paul