From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Ladi Prosek <lprosek@redhat.com>, KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: nSVM: do not forward NMI window singlestep VM exits to L1
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 19:46:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170619174629.GA10318@potion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b1132747-75bd-6399-48fb-edf9277e2468@redhat.com>
2017-06-19 19:17+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 19/06/2017 18:17, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> > Right, we only need the single step over IRET and interrupt shadow.
> >
> > Btw. instead of single-stepping over IRET/interrupt shadow, could we set
> > INTERRUPT_SHADOW in VMCB, inject the NMI, and let it execute?
> > This mechanism would explain why AMD didn't provide a trap for IRET ...
>
> You mean they didn't provide a trap-like VMEXIT for IRET, only fault-like?
Yes. SVM has trap-like VM exit, so I didn't understand why it was not
used for IRET. Forcing the hypervisor to have two VM exits and a clumsy
single-step felt out of place when the rest was designed nicely ...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-19 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-15 11:20 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: SVM: improve NMI window singlestep Ladi Prosek
2017-06-15 11:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: SVM: introduce disable_nmi_singlestep helper Ladi Prosek
2017-06-15 11:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: nSVM: do not forward NMI window singlestep VM exits to L1 Ladi Prosek
2017-06-15 12:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-16 13:26 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-06-19 12:50 ` Ladi Prosek
2017-06-19 13:05 ` Ladi Prosek
2017-06-19 13:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-19 16:17 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-06-19 17:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-19 17:46 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2017-06-20 7:41 ` Ladi Prosek
2017-06-20 13:01 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-06-15 11:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: SVM: hide TF/RF flags used by NMI singlestep Ladi Prosek
2017-06-15 12:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-15 13:02 ` Ladi Prosek
2017-06-15 13:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-15 11:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: SVM: don't NMI singlestep over event injection Ladi Prosek
2017-06-15 12:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-15 12:38 ` Ladi Prosek
2017-06-15 13:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-15 12:03 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: SVM: improve NMI window singlestep Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-15 12:10 ` Ladi Prosek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170619174629.GA10318@potion \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lprosek@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).