From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: use RCU to allow dynamic kvm->vcpus array Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:37:41 +0200 Message-ID: <20170817093741.08e06833.cohuck@redhat.com> References: <20170816194037.9460-1-rkrcmar@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Radim =?UTF-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Paolo Bonzini , Christoffer Dall , Marc Zyngier , Christian Borntraeger , James Hogan , Paul Mackerras , Alexander Graf To: David Hildenbrand Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51194 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750857AbdHQHht (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Aug 2017 03:37:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:29:51 +0200 David Hildenbrand wrote: > As Alex said, doubling the size every time we run out of space could be > done. > > I clearly favor a solution that doesn't require user space changes. +1 to both of this.