From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Fix trying to cancel vmlauch/vmresume
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 15:00:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170818130054.GD20100@flask> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1503019818-3973-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
2017-08-17 18:30-0700, Wanpeng Li:
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 3861 at /home/kernel/ssd/kvm/arch/x86/kvm//vmx.c:11299 nested_vmx_vmexit+0x176e/0x1980 [kvm_intel]
> CPU: 7 PID: 3861 Comm: qemu-system-x86 Tainted: G W OE 4.13.0-rc4+ #11
> RIP: 0010:nested_vmx_vmexit+0x176e/0x1980 [kvm_intel]
> Call Trace:
> ? kvm_multiple_exception+0x149/0x170 [kvm]
> ? handle_emulation_failure+0x79/0x230 [kvm]
> ? load_vmcs12_host_state+0xa80/0xa80 [kvm_intel]
> ? check_chain_key+0x137/0x1e0
> ? reexecute_instruction.part.168+0x130/0x130 [kvm]
> nested_vmx_inject_exception_vmexit+0xb7/0x100 [kvm_intel]
> ? nested_vmx_inject_exception_vmexit+0xb7/0x100 [kvm_intel]
> vmx_queue_exception+0x197/0x300 [kvm_intel]
> kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x1b0c/0x2c90 [kvm]
> ? kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable+0x220/0x220 [kvm]
> ? preempt_count_sub+0x18/0xc0
> ? restart_apic_timer+0x17d/0x300 [kvm]
> ? kvm_lapic_restart_hv_timer+0x37/0x50 [kvm]
> ? kvm_arch_vcpu_load+0x1d8/0x350 [kvm]
> kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x4e4/0x910 [kvm]
> ? kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x4e4/0x910 [kvm]
> ? kvm_dev_ioctl+0xbe0/0xbe0 [kvm]
>
> The flag "nested_run_pending", which can override the decision of which should run
> next, L1 or L2. nested_run_pending=1 means that we *must* run L2 next, not L1. This
> is necessary in particular when L1 did a VMLAUNCH of L2 and therefore expects L2 to
> be run (and perhaps be injected with an event it specified, etc.). Nested_run_pending
> is especially intended to avoid switching to L1 in the injection decision-point.
>
> I catch this in the queue exception path, this patch fixes it by running L2 next
> instead of L1 in the queue exception path.
>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index e398946..3e64a9b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -2466,6 +2466,9 @@ static int nested_vmx_check_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> struct vmcs12 *vmcs12 = get_vmcs12(vcpu);
> unsigned int nr = vcpu->arch.exception.nr;
>
> + if (to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.nested_run_pending)
> + return 0;
This will inject the exception into L2, even though L1 should get it.
We can't return 1 either, as that would just drop the exception ...
Seems like we should request an immediate VM exit from L2 and keep the
exception for L1 pending for a subsequent nested VM exit.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-18 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-18 1:30 [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Fix trying to cancel vmlauch/vmresume Wanpeng Li
2017-08-18 13:00 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2017-08-18 20:34 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170818130054.GD20100@flask \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox