From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
llvmlinux@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
andreyknvl <andreyknvl@google.com>,
Michael Davidson <md@google.com>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Subject: Re: "KVM: x86: generalize guest_cpuid_has_ helpers" breaks clang
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:18:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170912151851.GA24313@flask> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+boDPGU_02AhzUCCHfHdPaviMd5sTJTuV5RuYNor4wRpg@mail.gmail.com>
2017-09-12 16:42+0200, Dmitry Vyukov:
> Hi Radim,
>
> I've just noticed that your commit "KVM: x86: generalize
> guest_cpuid_has_ helpers" breaks clang build on this assert:
>
> static __always_inline struct cpuid_reg x86_feature_cpuid(unsigned x86_feature)
> {
> unsigned x86_leaf = x86_feature / 32;
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(x86_leaf));
>
>
> In clang __builtin_constant_p is never true for function arguments,
> it's true only for compile-time constants (what you can use as stack
> array size, or C++ template argument). What would work is an
> additional macro along the lines of:
GCC optimizes it thanks to __always_inline, so the x86_feature is
constant in each instance of this function ... the goal is to have
compile-time input checking.
> #define x86_feature_cpuid(x) (BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(x),
> __x86_feature_cpuid(x))
>
> But again assuming that caller pass the constant directly.
The __builtin_constant_p() check is just a canary, the important ones
are
BUILD_BUG_ON(x86_leaf >= ARRAY_SIZE(reverse_cpuid));
BUILD_BUG_ON(reverse_cpuid[x86_leaf].function == 0);
and these would be very awkward if moved out of the function.
> Could you please fix it?
Sure, I can just make them BUG_ON (or WARN_ON with error handling), but
I tried with clang version 4.0.1 and got no errors -- are you using an
older version? (or a command other than `make HOSTCC=clang CC=clang`)
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-12 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-12 14:42 "KVM: x86: generalize guest_cpuid_has_ helpers" breaks clang Dmitry Vyukov
2017-09-12 15:18 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2017-09-12 15:51 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-09-12 15:54 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-09-12 16:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-09-12 16:16 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-09-12 16:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-09-12 17:33 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-09-13 10:58 ` Radim Krčmář
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170912151851.GA24313@flask \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=ghackmann@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvmlinux@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=md@google.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox