From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] kvm,mips: Fix potential swait_active() races
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:22:37 -0700
Message-ID: <20170913222236.GA29418@linux-80c1.suse>
References: <20170913200824.28067-1-dave@stgolabs.net>
 <20170913200824.28067-8-dave@stgolabs.net>
 <0942aa56-47c7-5a21-4786-f97d38e74004@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, npiggin@gmail.com,
        paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0942aa56-47c7-5a21-4786-f97d38e74004@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>has_sleeper*s*.  Can fix when committing.

So for regular waitqueues we have it singular, which is why I kept
that name -- albeit sleepers() being better suited, yes. I don't think
we want to rename it unless we rename all wq_has_sleeper() callers as
well.

Thanks,
Davidlohr