From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Part2 PATCH v4 02/29] x86/CPU/AMD: Add the Secure Encrypted
 Virtualization CPU feature
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:02:42 +0200
Message-ID: <20170930080242.ccmacvdeffnj72ne@pd.tnic>
References: <20170919204627.3875-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
 <20170919204627.3875-3-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
 <20170929121900.3wc5axlkanfggpdr@pd.tnic>
 <f2c19c75-d66e-682c-f545-3276c6dc995e@amd.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        x86@kernel.org
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f2c19c75-d66e-682c-f545-3276c6dc995e@amd.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 05:44:24PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> Part1 is based on tip/master and Part2 is based on kvm/master.
> 
> With the current division, we should be able to compile and run part1
> and part2 independently. This patch defines X86_FEATURE_SEV which is
> currently been used by svm.c hence I kept the patch in Part2.
> 
> If we move it in Part1 then Part2 build will fail -- I am okay with
> including it as a pre-cursor to Part2 series. Is this something acceptable?

No no, don't do anything. I was just wondering about the reason for the move.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--