From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Subject: Re: sysbench throughput degradation in 4.13+
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 15:51:37 +0100
Message-ID: <20171010145137.GA2922@codeblueprint.co.uk>
References: <CAD9gYJJ9nSAbznEn80hfY3=+YjA8cKw6RztpgW6iDm7rQ0EsFg@mail.gmail.com>
 <50a279d3-84eb-3403-f2f0-854934778037@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20170922155348.zujigkn3o5eylctn@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <754f5a9f-5332-148d-2631-918fc7a7cfe9@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20170927093530.s3sgdz2vamc5ka4w@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20170927135820.61cd077f@cuia.usersys.redhat.com>
 <20171002225312.GA24578@codeblueprint.co.uk>
 <20171003083932.3qa7jw2spmi5n5pg@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20171004161850.wgnu73dokpjfyfdk@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20171006103623.GA3314@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
        Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        ????????? <jinpuwang@gmail.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
        "KVM-ML (kvm@vger.kernel.org)" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        vcaputo@pengaru.com, Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171006103623.GA3314@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 06 Oct, at 11:36:23AM, Matt Fleming wrote:
> 
> It's a similar story for hackbench-threads-{pipes,sockets}, i.e. pipes
> regress but performance is restored for sockets.
> 
> Of course, like a dope, I forgot to re-run netperf with your WA_WEIGHT
> patch. So I've queued that up now and it should be done by tomorrow.

Yeah, netperf results look fine for either your NO_WA_WEIGHT or
WA_WEIGHT patch.

Any ETA on when this is going to tip?