From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: limit kvm_handle_page_fault to #PF handling
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 21:01:53 +0200
Message-ID: <20171010190152.GB28763@flask>
References: <1507625383-23795-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1507625383-23795-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

2017-10-10 10:49+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> It has always annoyed me a bit how SVM_EXIT_NPF is handled by
> pf_interception.  This is also the only reason behind the
> under-documented need_unprotect argument to kvm_handle_page_fault.
> Let NPF go straight to kvm_mmu_page_fault, just like VMX
> does in handle_ept_violation and handle_ept_misconfig.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---

And we also drop the unneeded pv async_pf switch,

Reviewed-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>