Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: nVMX/nSVM: Don't intercept #UD when running L2

Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-11T13:25:12Z

On 11/01/2018 00:01, Liran Alon wrote:
>
> ----- jmattson@google.com wrote:
>
>> Liran, Are you planning to submit reverts for ae1f57670703 and
>> ac9b305caa0d?
>
> Yes.
> I just didn't had time to deal with this as I was busy with other Oracle Ravello specific issues.
> I think reverting both commits is the right thing to do.
>
> Paolo: Note that the VMware Backdoor support series we have patched here (was not yet queued) is based a bit on the code of this commit. Do you wish me to first wait that those patches will be queued and then I will create the revert for these (and resolve relevant conflicts) or that I will create the reverts for these on top of what is currently queued and you will resolve the conflicts resulting when applying VMware Backdoor support series?

I can take care of the reverts, but you'll have to repost the backdoor
series. Unfortunately due to my involvement with Spectre in Red Hat
(and Radim's vacation :)) I have fallen short on the review backlog.

Paolo