From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoffer Dall Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Preserve the revious read from the pending table Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 15:52:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20171120145200.GK28855@cbox> References: <20171116175821.26544-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <20171116175821.26544-3-marc.zyngier@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: AKASHI Takahiro , Kristina Martsenko , Suzuki K Poulose , kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org To: Marc Zyngier Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:40151 "EHLO mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751155AbdKTOvw (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Nov 2017 09:51:52 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-f65.google.com with SMTP id b189so19152022wmd.5 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 06:51:51 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171116175821.26544-3-marc.zyngier@arm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 05:58:16PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > The current pending table parsing code assumes that we keep the > previous read of the pending bits, but keep that variable in > the current block, making sure it is discarded on each loop. > > We end-up using whatever is on the stack. Who knows, it might > just be the right thing... ouch, again. > > Fixes: 280771252c1ba ("KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_SAVE_PENDING_TABLES") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.12 > Reported-by: AKASHI Takahiro > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall > --- > virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c > index 2f05f732d3fd..f47e8481fa45 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c > @@ -327,13 +327,13 @@ int vgic_v3_save_pending_tables(struct kvm *kvm) > int last_byte_offset = -1; > struct vgic_irq *irq; > int ret; > + u8 val; > > list_for_each_entry(irq, &dist->lpi_list_head, lpi_list) { > int byte_offset, bit_nr; > struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; > gpa_t pendbase, ptr; > bool stored; > - u8 val; > > vcpu = irq->target_vcpu; > if (!vcpu) > -- > 2.14.2 >