From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoffer Dall Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Preserve the revious read from the pending table Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 15:56:10 +0100 Message-ID: <20171120145610.GL28855@cbox> References: <20171116175821.26544-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <20171116175821.26544-4-marc.zyngier@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: AKASHI Takahiro , Kristina Martsenko , Suzuki K Poulose , kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org To: Marc Zyngier Return-path: Received: from mail-wr0-f195.google.com ([209.85.128.195]:37610 "EHLO mail-wr0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751181AbdKTO4B (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Nov 2017 09:56:01 -0500 Received: by mail-wr0-f195.google.com with SMTP id k61so8317250wrc.4 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 06:56:01 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171116175821.26544-4-marc.zyngier@arm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 05:58:17PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > The current pending table parsing code assumes that we keep the > previous read of the pending bits, but keep that variable in > the current block, making sure it is discarded on each loop. > > We end-up using whatever is on the stack. Who knows, it might > just be the right thing... And the hits just keep on coming... > > Fixes: 33d3bc9556a7d ("KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Read initial LPI pending table") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.8 > Reported-by: AKASHI Takahiro > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall > --- > virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c > index a3754ec719c4..370086006838 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c > @@ -421,6 +421,7 @@ static int its_sync_lpi_pending_table(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > u32 *intids; > int nr_irqs, i; > unsigned long flags; > + u8 pendmask; > > nr_irqs = vgic_copy_lpi_list(vcpu, &intids); > if (nr_irqs < 0) > @@ -428,7 +429,6 @@ static int its_sync_lpi_pending_table(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) { > int byte_offset, bit_nr; > - u8 pendmask; > > byte_offset = intids[i] / BITS_PER_BYTE; > bit_nr = intids[i] % BITS_PER_BYTE; > -- > 2.14.2 >