public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: Fix SMCCC handling of unimplemented SMC/HVC calls
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 11:42:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180116104249.GO21403@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180116102347.20892-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com>

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:23:47AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> KVM doesn't follow the SMCCC when it comes to unimplemented calls,
> and inject an UNDEF instead of returning an error. Since firmware
> calls are now used for security mitigation, they are becoming more
> common, and the undef is counter productive.
> 
> Instead, let's follow the SMCCC which states that -1 must be returned
> to the caller when getting an unknown function number.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

And applied to kvmarm/master.  I'll attempt to herd this upstream asap.
-Christoffer

> ---
> This has been identified as an issue when working on the Spectre issues,
> as guest have to perform HVC/SMC calls to invalidate their branch predictors,
> and need to perform some form of discovery. 32bit is affected too, but the
> mitigation doesn't involve firmware, so we can fix it separately.
> 
>  arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> index 304203fa9e33..e60494f1eef9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  
>  	ret = kvm_psci_call(vcpu);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
> -		kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
> +		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL);
>  		return 1;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  
>  static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  {
> -	kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
> +	vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL);
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.14.2
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2018-01-16 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-16 10:23 [PATCH] arm64: KVM: Fix SMCCC handling of unimplemented SMC/HVC calls Marc Zyngier
2018-01-16 10:42 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180116104249.GO21403@cbox \
    --to=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox