From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Schwidefsky Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] s390: add system call to run tasks with modified branch prediction Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:55:06 +0100 Message-ID: <20180117125506.26f3813c@mschwideX1> References: <1516182519-10623-1-git-send-email-schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> <1516182519-10623-5-git-send-email-schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> <5bda76be-0fec-8165-20bf-5cd8e51e955a@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: Florian Weimer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , Paolo Bonzini , Cornelia Huck , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jon Masters , Marcus Meissner , Jiri Kosina To: Christian Borntraeger Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:14:52 +0100 Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 01/17/2018 11:03 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > On 01/17/2018 10:48 AM, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > >>          rc = syscall(__NR_s390_modify_bp); > >>          if (rc) { > >>                  perror("s390_modify_bp"); > >>                  exit(EXIT_FAILURE); > >>          } > > > > Isn't this traditionally done through personality or prctl? > > I think we want this per thread (and not per process). So I assume personality > will not work out. Can a prctl be done per thread? The prctl interface seems to be usable to set a per-thread control as well. But there is no architecture specific prctl as far as I can see. Maybe a common PR_SET_NOBP with an arch function like arch_set_nobp. > > > > This looks like something other architectures may want as well. Yes, that is likely. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.