From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [RFC 10/10] x86/enter: Use IBRS on syscall and interrupts Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 08:50:29 -0500 Message-ID: <20180121135029.GM10086@char.us.oracle.com> References: <1516476182-5153-1-git-send-email-karahmed@amazon.de> <1516476182-5153-11-git-send-email-karahmed@amazon.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen , Andrea Arcangeli , Andy Lutomirski , Arjan van de Ven , Ashok Raj , Asit Mallick , Borislav Petkov , Dan Williams , Dave Hansen , David Woodhouse , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "H . Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Janakarajan Natarajan , Joerg Roedel , Jun Nakajima , Laura Abbott , Linus Torvalds , Masami Hiramatsu Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1516476182-5153-11-git-send-email-karahmed@amazon.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 08:23:01PM +0100, KarimAllah Ahmed wrote: > From: Tim Chen > > Stop Indirect Branch Speculation on every user space to kernel space > transition and reenable it when returning to user space./ How about interrupts? That is should .macro interrupt have the same treatment?