From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"Jim Mattson" <jmattson@google.com>,
"Mihai Carabas" <mihai.carabas@oracle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvm list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Liran Alon" <liran.alon@oracle.com>,
"Anthony Liguori" <aliguori@amazon.com>,
"Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [9/8] KVM: x86: limit MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL access based on CPUID availability
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 12:10:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180205111034.ie6vbui62wx2irkl@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <75049dca-3389-9cc7-44e3-a487a797c605@redhat.com>
* Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 30/01/2018 12:45, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Jan 2018, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 08:57 -0800, Jim Mattson wrote:
> >>> It's really hard to tell which patches are being proposed for which
> >>> repositories, but assuming that everything else is correct, I don't
> >>> think your condition is adequate. What if the physical CPU and the
> >>> virtual CPU both have CPUID.(EAX=7H,ECX=0):EDX[26], but only the
> >>> physical CPU has CPUID.(EAX=7H,ECX=0):EDX[27]? If the guest has write
> >>> access to MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, it can set MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL[1]
> >>> (STIBP), even though setting that bit in the guest should raise #GP.
> >>
> >> Everything we're talking about here is for tip/x86/pti. Which I note
> >> has just updated to be 4.15-based, although I thought it was going to
> >> stay on 4.14 for now. So I've updated my tree at
> >> http://git.infradead.org/linux-retpoline.git/shortlog/refs/heads/ibpb
> >> accordingly.
> >
> > Yes, we tried to stay on 4.14 base but this started to created nasty merge
> > conflicts for no value. Merging in v4.15 turned out to resolve those issues
> > while still serving as the feed branch for Gregs stable work. For the time
> > being we try to make stable backporting at least for 4.14/15 as painless as
> > possible.
>
> Great, then the "per-VCPU MSR bitmaps" branch
> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git refs/heads/msr-bitmaps)
> that I created last weekend can be pulled directly in tip/x86/pti.
Can this branch still be rebased, to fix the SoB chain of:
de3a0021a606 ("KVM: nVMX: Eliminate vmcs02 pool")
?
I'm not sure what workflow resulted in this commit, but it is missing your SoB:
commit de3a0021a60635de96aa92713c1a31a96747d72c
Author: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
AuthorDate: Mon Nov 27 17:22:25 2017 -0600
Commit: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
CommitDate: Sat Jan 27 09:43:03 2018 +0100
KVM: nVMX: Eliminate vmcs02 pool
The potential performance advantages of a vmcs02 pool have never been
realized. To simplify the code, eliminate the pool. Instead, a single
vmcs02 is allocated per VCPU when the VCPU enters VMX operation.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # prereq for Spectre mitigation
Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Kanda <mark.kanda@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Ameya More <ameya.more@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
You probably rebased Radim'm tree?
If this tree can still be rebased I'd like to re-pull it into tip:x86/pti, as
those bits are not yet upstream.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-05 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-09 12:03 [PATCH v2 0/8] KVM: x86: expose CVE-2017-5715 ("Spectre variant 2") mitigations to guest Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-09 12:03 ` [PATCH 1/8] KVM: x86: add SPEC_CTRL and IBPB_SUPPORT accessors Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-15 9:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-09 12:03 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86/msr: add definitions for indirect branch predictor MSRs Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-09 12:03 ` [PATCH 3/8] kvm: vmx: pass MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL and MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD down to the guest Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-13 10:16 ` Longpeng (Mike)
2018-01-15 9:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-15 9:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
[not found] ` <1515839272.22302.520.camel@amazon.co.uk>
2018-01-15 9:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-09 12:03 ` [PATCH 4/8] kvm: vmx: Set IBPB when running a different VCPU Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-12 1:49 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-01-12 17:03 ` Jim Mattson
2018-01-13 9:29 ` Woodhouse, David
2018-01-15 9:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-09 12:03 ` [PATCH 5/8] KVM: SVM: fix comment Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-15 9:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-09 12:03 ` [PATCH 6/8] kvm: svm: pass MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL and MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD down to guest Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-09 14:22 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-01-09 16:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-09 16:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-11 10:45 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-01-10 20:13 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-11 10:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-09 12:03 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86/svm: Set IBPB when running a different VCPU Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-09 14:23 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-01-09 12:03 ` [PATCH 8/8] KVM: x86: add SPEC_CTRL and IBPB_SUPPORT to MSR and CPUID lists Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-13 1:25 ` Eric Wheeler
2018-01-13 8:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-16 0:40 ` Eric Wheeler
2018-01-16 7:39 ` R: " Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-09 12:03 ` [PATCH 9/8] KVM: x86: limit MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL access based on CPUID availability Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-16 0:55 ` Eric Wheeler
2018-01-16 12:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-30 13:21 ` [9/8] " Mihai Carabas
2018-01-30 16:33 ` Jim Mattson
2018-01-30 16:43 ` Mihai Carabas
2018-01-30 16:57 ` Jim Mattson
2018-01-30 17:14 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-30 17:38 ` Jim Mattson
2018-01-30 17:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-30 23:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-30 23:47 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-31 1:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-05 11:10 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2018-02-05 11:15 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-05 12:10 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180205111034.ie6vbui62wx2irkl@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=aliguori@amazon.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
--cc=mihai.carabas@oracle.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox