From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [STABLE 4.9.y PATCH 0/9] Backport of KVM Speculation Control
 support
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 18:14:36 +0100
Message-ID: <20180208171436.GA3521@kroah.com>
References: <1517938181-15317-1-git-send-email-dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
 <9ea4d52a-7ae6-a179-2f86-1e7b77255387@redhat.com>
 <1517951146.3677.34.camel@amazon.co.uk>
 <20180208024959.GA16399@kroah.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@amazon.de>, stable@vger.kernel.org
To: "Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Return-path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180208024959.GA16399@kroah.com>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 03:49:59AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 09:05:46PM +0000, Woodhouse, David wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 19:01 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > On 06/02/2018 18:29, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > > I've put together a linux-4.9.y branch at 
> > > > http://git.infradead.org/retpoline-stable.git/shortlog/refs/heads/linux-4.9.y
> > > > 
> > > > Most of it is fairly straightforward, apart from the IBPB on context 
> > > > switch for which Tim has already posted a candidate. I wanted some more
> > > > review on my backports of the KVM bits though, including some extra
> > > > historical patches I pulled in.
> > > 
> > > Looks good!  Thanks for the work,
> > > 
> > > Paolo
> > 
> > Thanks. In that case, Greg, the full set is lined up in
> > http://git.infradead.org/retpoline-stable.git/shortlog/refs/heads/linux-4.9.y
> > or git://git.infradead.org/retpoline-stable linux-4.9.y
> 
> Many thanks for all of this work.  I've now queued up all of these.

There's a problem with the backport of 6342c50ad12e ("KVM: nVMX:
vmx_complete_nested_posted_interrupt() can't fail") as there is still a
check in the function that can fail:

		vapic_page = kmap(vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page);
		if (!vapic_page) {
			WARN_ON(1);
			return -ENOMEM;
		}

Do we need something else before this patch in order to fix this?  I
guess kmap really can't fail, should I just drop the whole (!vapic_page)
check?

thanks,

greg k-h