From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] vfio, dax: prevent long term filesystem-dax pins and other fixes Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 09:23:45 +1100 Message-ID: <20180227222345.GK30854@dastard> References: <151970519370.26729.1011551137381425076.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jane Chu , Michal Hocko , Jan Kara , kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org, Matthew Wilcox , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Christoph Hellwig , "supporter:XFS FILESYSTEM" , linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, Alex Williamson , Gerd Rausch , Andreas Dilger , Alexander Viro , Jan Kara , linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Theodore Ts'o , "Darrick J. Wong" To: Dan Williams Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <151970519370.26729.1011551137381425076.stgit-p8uTFz9XbKj2zm6wflaqv1nYeNYlB/vhral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 08:19:54PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > The following series implements... > Changes since v3 [1]: > > * Kill IS_DAX() in favor of explicit IS_FSDAX() and IS_DEVDAX() helpers. > Jan noted, "having IS_DAX() and IS_FSDAX() doing almost the same, just > not exactly the same, is IMHO a recipe for confusion", and I agree. A > nice side effect of this elimination is a cleanup to remove occasions of > "#ifdef CONFIG_FS_DAX" in C files, it is all moved to header files > now. (Jan) Dan, can you please stop sending random patches in a patch set to random lists? Your patchsets are hitting 4 or 5 different procmail filters here and so it gets split across several different mailing list buckets. It's really annoying to have to go reconstruct every patch set you send back into a single series in a single bucket.... Can you please fix up your patch set sending again? -Dave. -- Dave Chinner david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org