From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v29 1/4] mm: support reporting free page blocks Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 19:07:22 +0300 Message-ID: <20180327190635-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <1522031994-7246-1-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <1522031994-7246-2-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <20180326142254.c4129c3a54ade686ee2a5e21@linux-foundation.org> <5AB9E377.30900@intel.com> <20180327063322.GW5652@dhcp22.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Wei Wang , Andrew Morton , virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, liliang.opensource@gmail.com, yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com, quan.xu0@gmail.com, nilal@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com, huangzhichao@huawei.com To: Michal Hocko Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180327063322.GW5652@dhcp22.suse.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 08:33:22AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > + * The function itself might sleep so it cannot be called from atomic > > > > + * contexts. > > > I don't see how walk_free_mem_block() can sleep. > > > > OK, it would be better to remove this sentence for the current version. But > > I think we could probably keep it if we decide to add cond_resched() below. > > The point of this sentence was to make any user aware that the function > might sleep from the very begining rather than chase existing callers > when we need to add cond_resched or sleep for any other reason. So I > would rather keep it. Let's say what it is then - "will be changed to sleep in the future". > -- > Michal Hocko > SUSE Labs