From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] KVM/X86: Introduce a new guest mapping interface Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 12:06:58 -0400 Message-ID: <20180515160658.GA12122@char.us.oracle.com> References: <1523829198-13236-1-git-send-email-karahmed@amazon.de> <1523880592.22952.9.camel@amazon.de> <34b4c91d-46f0-1205-5850-f13ccb70d496@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "Raslan, KarimAllah" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "rkrcmar@redhat.com" , "david@redhat.com" To: Paolo Bonzini Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <34b4c91d-46f0-1205-5850-f13ccb70d496@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 02:27:13PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 16/04/2018 14:09, Raslan, KarimAllah wrote: > >> I assume the caching will also be a separate patch. > > Yup, do you want me to include it in this one? I already have it, I > > just thought that I get those bits out first. >=20 > It's the same for me. >=20 > Paolo >=20 > >> It looks good except that I'd squash patches 4 and 9 together. > > Yup, makes sense. I should have squashed them when I removed the=A0 > > lifecycle change! > >=20 > > Thanks for the review :) > >=20 > >> But I'd like a second set of eyes to look at it. Did anybody else end up reviewing these patches? And would it make sense to repost a new version with the #4 and #9 squashed? Thanks. >=20