From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: kwankhede@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pasic@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] vfio/mdev: Check globally for duplicate devices
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 10:13:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180522101346.3442e1af.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180518191025.3187.29141.stgit@gimli.home>
On Fri, 18 May 2018 13:10:25 -0600
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:
> When we create an mdev device, we check for duplicates against the
> parent device and return -EEXIST if found, but the mdev device
> namespace is global since we'll link all devices from the bus. We do
> catch this later in sysfs_do_create_link_sd() to return -EEXIST, but
> with it comes a kernel warning and stack trace for trying to create
> duplicate sysfs links, which makes it an undesirable response.
>
> Therefore we should really be looking for duplicates across all mdev
> parent devices, or as implemented here, against our mdev device list.
> Using mdev_list to prevent duplicates means that we can remove
> mdev_parent.lock, but in order not to serialize mdev device creation
> and removal globally, we add mdev_device.active which allows UUIDs to
> be reserved such that we can drop the mdev_list_lock before the mdev
> device is fully in place.
>
> Two behavioral notes; first, mdev_parent.lock had the side-effect of
> serializing mdev create and remove ops per parent device. This was
> an implementation detail, not an intentional guarantee provided to
> the mdev vendor drivers. Vendor drivers can trivially provide this
> serialization internally if necessary. Second, review comments note
> the new -EAGAIN behavior when the device, and in particular the remove
> attribute, becomes visible in sysfs. If a remove is triggered prior
> to completion of mdev_device_create() the user will see a -EAGAIN
> error. While the errno is different, receiving an error during this
> period is not, the previous implementation returned -ENODEV for the
> same condition. Furthermore, the consistency to the user is improved
> in the case where mdev_device_remove_ops() returns error. Previously
> concurrent calls to mdev_device_remove() could see the device
> disappear with -ENODEV and return in the case of error. Now a user
> would see -EAGAIN while the device is in this transitory state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> ---
> Documentation/vfio-mediated-device.txt | 5 ++
> drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c | 102 +++++++++++---------------------
> drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_private.h | 2 -
> 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
I think it is better to deal with any possible vendor driver
implications on top of this (I still believe that vfio-ccw is fine).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-22 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-18 19:10 [PATCH v4 0/2] vfio/mdev: Device namespace protection Alex Williamson
2018-05-18 19:10 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] vfio/mdev: Check globally for duplicate devices Alex Williamson
2018-05-18 19:37 ` Kirti Wankhede
2018-05-22 8:13 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2018-05-22 15:53 ` Alex Williamson
2018-05-23 4:53 ` Zhenyu Wang
2018-05-18 19:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] vfio/mdev: Re-order sysfs attribute creation Alex Williamson
2018-05-18 19:38 ` Kirti Wankhede
2018-05-22 8:14 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-05-18 19:37 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] vfio/mdev: Device namespace protection Kirti Wankhede
2018-05-22 17:17 ` Halil Pasic
2018-05-22 18:38 ` Alex Williamson
2018-05-23 8:56 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-05-23 12:29 ` Halil Pasic
2018-05-23 13:34 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180522101346.3442e1af.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox